Two lists of provisions from the texts: those that a supporter of can point to, and those that a critic of it can point to. Each row gives the words of the text and where they are. This document does not argue for or against the treaty.The treatyThe Agreement in respect of Gibraltar between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community, of the one part, and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of the other part. It was signed in Brussels on 14 July 2026.
15 September 2026
The English texts on this page come from the official English versions published by the United Kingdom (UK) Government (GOV.UK: the Agreement as Command Paper MS No. 9 (2026)) and Gibraltar (the Gibraltar Gazette). Where a text exists only in Spanish (BOE), we quote it in Spanish and say so, and any translation beside it is ours.
Sources. The treaty (Command Paper MS 9 (2026), Volumes I and II: 336 articles, 30 annexes, four protocols); the 2019 UK–Spain tax agreement; the UK–Gibraltar Concordat of 14 July 2026; the Council and Commission declaration of 31 March 2026 (a statement by those two institutions, not a term of the treaty); the seven UK–Spain administrative arrangements of 25 June 2026; and, in two rows, the framework of 31 December 2020 (a political document, not a signed instrument). Other material is used only in the section on the three legal opinions of March 2026, which quotes those opinions, and where a row or that section cites a Legal Notice in the Gibraltar Gazette. No press report and no statement by any minister is used. The last column of each table says where other documents in this set deal with the same provision.
Verification. The citations in both tables were checked against the text of the Command Paper. The provisions that carry the most weight are quoted in the instruments' own words. These things could not be checked from the texts and are left out: practice on the ground, the regulations Gibraltar has made since, and the dates of Legal Notices.
Weight. Each row is graded by the wording of the provision it rests on, not by how much the provision matters. Strong: the provision applies without a later decision or another party's act; any condition or exception in the same text is stated in the row. Conditional: it depends on a later decision or on another party. Symbolic: it states a position without changing one. Where a provision gives a Party or an authority a power (the text says "may"), the grade is about the wording of the power; the power is used only if that Party or authority decides to use it, and the row says whose decision that is.
Each case opens with its provisions in one table. A plain account of them follows.
| Provision | What it says, and where | Instrument | Weight | Elsewhere in this set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Removal of the border fence | The treaty says that all physical barriers related to the circulation of persons between the European Union () and Gibraltar are to be removed. The implementation plan of the , says that its first phase, to be completed before 15 July 2026, includes demolishing the border fence entirely.Read the texts on thisThe treaty says that all physical barriers related to the circulation of persons between the EU and Gibraltar are to be removed [Article 28]. The implementation plan of the UK, for Gibraltar, says that its first phase, to be completed before 15 July 2026, includes demolishing the border fence entirely [Arrangement , Annex 2]. |
Vol I, Part Two; Arrangement | Strong for the treaty's rule that physical barriers to the circulation of persons are to be removed. The plan states what is to be done; it does not state that it has been doneRead the texts on thisStrong for Article 28. The plan states what is to be done; it does not state that it has been done |
Front document paragraph 1.3 |
| Movement without border checks between Gibraltar and the Schengen States | The parties must ensure that persons may circulate between Gibraltar and the that apply the in full without border checks, whatever their nationality. This does not affect the sea-border rules of the Schengen Borders Code. Those EU countries or the UK, for Gibraltar, may exceptionally reinstate border control where there is a serious threat to public policy, public health or internal security. It may last up to 10 days. It may be prolonged by 20 days and then by periods of one month, up to six months in all. It may be done only as a last resort. Either party, after consultations, may temporarily suspend its obligations under the first five titles of the treaty's part on the circulation of persons. It may do this in two cases. One is where commitments in that part are seriously not respected. The other is where a party considers that it faces a serious and persistent threat to internal security because there are no controls. For travellers moving between Gibraltar and Spain, routine customs checks are not required to be carried out. This does not affect a rule in one of the treaty's annexes. It also does not affect any non-discriminatory controls that the customs authorities of Spain may carry out, in Spain.Read the texts on thisThe Parties must ensure that persons may circulate between Gibraltar and the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full without border checks, whatever their nationality. This does not affect the provisions on sea borders in Annex VI of the Schengen Borders Code [Article 30(1)]. Those EU countries or the UK, for Gibraltar, may exceptionally reinstate border control where there is a serious threat to public policy, public health or internal security. It may last up to 10 days. It may be prolonged by 20 days and then by periods of one month, up to six months in all. It may be done only as a last resort [Article 30(2)]. Either Party, after consultations, may temporarily suspend its obligations under Titles I to V of Part Two. It may do this in two cases. One is where commitments under Part Two are seriously not respected. The other is where a Party considers that it faces a serious and persistent threat to internal security because there are no controls [Article 67(1)]. For travellers moving between Gibraltar and Spain, routine customs checks are not required to be carried out. This does not affect Article 22(3) of Annex 23 of the treaty. It also does not affect any non-discriminatory controls that the customs authorities of Spain may carry out, in Spain [Arrangement , Travellers, paragraph 6.7]. |
Vol I, Articles 30, 67; Arrangement | Strong (subject to Articles 30(2) and 67) | Front document section 1.3 (No checks, officers present); short version spread 10 |
| Residents of Gibraltar and entry into Gibraltar | A treaty rule covers persons resident in Gibraltar who do not meet the other entry conditions of the Schengen Borders Code. In any event, they must not be prevented from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar. The text does not say who must not prevent them. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals who do not meet the entry conditions does not cover persons resident in Gibraltar, or persons in certain categories set out in the Schengen Borders Code.Read the texts on thisArticle 43(2) covers persons resident in Gibraltar who do not meet the other entry conditions of Article 6(1) of the Schengen Borders Code. In any event, they must not be prevented from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar. The text does not say who must not prevent them. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals who do not meet the entry conditions does not cover persons resident in Gibraltar, or persons in the categories set out in Article 6(5) of the Schengen Borders Code [Article 33(4)(a)(ii)]. |
Vol I, Articles 33, 43 | Strong | Front document section 1.3 |
| Order of checks on entry; arrest of residents under Article 34 | On entry, border checks are to be carried out first by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, and then by those of Spain. On exit the order is reversed. Where Spain's authorities require coercive action for arrest or detention and the person is resident in Gibraltar, the action may be carried out only by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. Those authorities must carry out the requested action on Spain's request, once they have the information needed for lawful execution. A separate rule of the treaty gives Spain's authorities the right to arrest, search, detain, interview or place under protection a person, or to seize or search property, where this is justified in the course of border control carried out by Spain's competent authorities and in accordance with Spanish, EU and international law. The text does not say how that separate rule and the rule on arrest or detention of residents apply together to residents.Read the texts on thisOn entry, border checks are to be carried out first by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, and then by those of Spain. On exit the order is reversed [Article 29(5)]. Suppose Spain's authorities require coercive action for arrest or detention and the person is resident in Gibraltar. Then the action may be carried out only by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. Those authorities must carry out the requested action on Spain's request, once they have the information needed for lawful execution [Article 34(9)]. Article 33(4)(c)(ii) separately gives Spain's authorities the right to arrest, search, detain, interview or place under protection a person, or to seize or search property, where this is justified in the course of border control carried out by Spain's competent authorities and in accordance with Spanish, EU and international law. The text does not say how Article 33(4)(c)(ii) and Article 34(9) apply together to residents. |
Vol I, Articles 29, 33, 34 | Strong for the words of two treaty rules named in the texts on this. The link to a third treaty rule, also named there, is not stated.Read the texts on thisStrong for the words of Article 29(5) and Article 34(9). The link to Article 33(4)(c)(ii) is not stated. |
Front document section 1.3 |
| Sovereignty clause | The treaty says that it, the arrangements, and any measures, instruments or conduct taken in application of them or as a result of them do not affect the legal positions of the UK and of Spain on sovereignty and jurisdiction. The treaty’s rules on settling disputes do not apply to any disputes about sovereignty and jurisdiction. If the respondent Party submits a reasoned statement that a request may affect those positions, the arbitration tribunal must not decide on them. The rule protecting those positions is also outside the provisions the dispute rules cover. Each of the seven arrangements carries a similar clause in its opening words.Read the texts on thisArticle 2 says that the treaty, the arrangements, and any measures, instruments or conduct taken in application of them or as a result of them do not affect the legal positions of the UK and of Spain on sovereignty and jurisdiction. Part Six (dispute settlement) does not apply to any disputes about sovereignty and jurisdiction. If the respondent Party submits a reasoned statement that a request may affect those positions, the arbitration tribunal must not decide on them [Article 301(6)]. Article 2 is also outside the provisions covered by Part Six [Article 301(2)(a)]. Each of the seven arrangements carries a similar clause [Arrangements -, preambles]. |
Vol I, Articles 2, 301; Arrangements | Strong | Front document section 1.5; texts volume, Article 2 card |
| Customs union and duties | A customs union between the EU and the UK, for Gibraltar, is set up. No customs duties on imports or exports, and no charges having equivalent effect, are to be applied between the EU and Gibraltar. Physical barriers for goods moving by land are to be removed. This does not affect a further rule of the treaty, or the formalities required and the checks and controls that the Parties may carry out to make sure the treaty's rules on customs, indirect taxation and trade are applied correctly. Until the EU-UK Cooperation Council adopts its decision that sets the start date and declares that the border posts and customs offices at the port and airport are set up, working and controlled, and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar is regarded as a third territory under EU customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law.Read the texts on thisA customs union between the EU and the UK, for Gibraltar, is established [Article 240]. No customs duties on imports or exports, and no charges having equivalent effect, are to be applied between the EU and Gibraltar [Article 243]. Physical barriers for goods moving by land are to be removed. This does not affect Article 252, or the formalities required and the checks and controls that the Parties may carry out to make sure the treaty's rules on customs, indirect taxation and trade are applied correctly [Article 246(1)]. Until the Cooperation Council adopts the decision in Article 247(1) and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar is regarded as a third territory under EU customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law [Article 247(5)]. |
Vol I, Part Three, Title II | Strong for the treaty's rules on the customs union, on no customs duties or charges of equivalent effect, and on removing physical barriers for goods moving by land, as worded; the rule that treats Gibraltar as a third territory applies until the Cooperation Council decision enters into force | Front document section 2; short version spreads 4–6 |
| Frontier workers: equal treatment | EU citizens who live legally in Spain and work in Gibraltar as employed frontier workers have equal treatment in Gibraltar. This includes pay, dismissal, trade-union membership, training, and social and tax advantages, except rights of access to housing. UK nationals who live legally in Gibraltar have the matching right in Spain. The treaty says that it gives no rights to individuals and cannot be relied on directly in national legal systems. It states that this does not affect two titles of the treaty named in the texts. That rule does not say how individuals may rely on those titles. Under the treaty's rule on suspending or ending the administrative arrangements, a list of its titles stops applying while the arrangements named there are suspended or terminated. The second of those two titles is not on that list.Read the texts on thisEU citizens who legally reside in Spain and are employed as frontier workers have equal treatment in Gibraltar. This includes remuneration, dismissal, trade-union membership, training, and social and tax advantages, except rights of access to housing [Article 292(3)]. UK nationals who legally reside in Gibraltar have the matching right in Spain [Article 292(2), (4)]. Article 21(1) says that the treaty confers no rights on persons and cannot be invoked directly in domestic legal systems. It states that this does not affect Titles I and II of Part Four. Article 21 does not say how individuals may rely on those Titles. Under Article 336(5), Title II of Part Three and Title III of Part Four, among others, cease to apply while the administrative arrangements named there are suspended or terminated. Title II of Part Four is not named there. |
Vol I, Part Four; Article 21(1) | Strong | Front document section 2; question register, question 33 |
| Social security coordination and Article 316 | Obligations under the treaty's social security protocol, or its annexes, may not be suspended under the treaty's rule on temporary measures after an arbitration ruling. Frontier workers receive sickness benefits in kind at the place of work. Unemployed cross-border workers receive benefit from the state where they were last employed. That bar names only the rule on temporary measures after an arbitration ruling. A separate rule, on suspending obligations after remedial measures on state aid, does not mention the protocol. It says the level of suspension is proposed in line with the principles set out in the rule on temporary measures after an arbitration ruling. It does not say whether the bar on suspending social security obligations is one of those principles. Under the treaty's rule on suspending or ending the administrative arrangements, the treaty's title on social security coordination stops applying from the day the arrangements named in that rule are suspended or terminated. It applies again when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded.Read the texts on thisObligations under the Protocol on Social Security Coordination or its Annexes may not be suspended under Article 316 [Article 316(3)]. Article 316 covers temporary measures after an arbitration ruling. Frontier workers receive sickness benefits in kind at the place of work [Article SSC.17(1)]. Unemployed cross-border workers receive benefit from the state of last employment [Article SSC.56(1)]. Article 316(3) names only Article 316. Article 209(12) is about suspending obligations after remedial measures on state aid. It does not mention the Protocol. It says the level of suspension is proposed in accordance with the principles set out in Article 316. It does not say whether Article 316(3) is one of those principles. Under Article 336(5), Title III of Part Four (social security coordination) ceases to apply from the day the arrangements named there are suspended or terminated. It applies again when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded. |
Vol I, Articles 209, 316, 336; Vol II, SSC Protocol | Strong for the treaty rule named in the texts on this, as wordedRead the texts on thisStrong for Article 316(3) as worded |
Question register, question 33 |
| State aid by Act of the Gibraltar Parliament | Some intended measures, made by an Act of the Gibraltar Parliament, grant or alter state aid of the kind the treaty's state aid rules cover. For those measures, the rule of prior authorisation does not apply. The independent authority's power to order recovery does not apply either. The UK, for Gibraltar, must ensure that such an intended measure is notified to its independent authority. It must also ensure that the authority has the power to issue an opinion. The UK, for Gibraltar, must have regard to such an opinion. Where applicable, it must also propose amendments to the Act in question for the Gibraltar Parliament to consider.Read the texts on thisSome intended measures grant or alter state aid referred to in Article 201 by an Act of the Gibraltar Parliament. For those measures, the rule of prior authorisation does not apply [Article 205(6)]. The independent authority's power to order recovery does not apply either [Article 205(7)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must ensure that such an intended measure is notified to its independent authority [Article 205(6)]. It must also ensure that the authority has the power to issue an opinion. The UK, for Gibraltar, must have regard to such an opinion. Where applicable, it must also propose amendments to the Act in question for the Gibraltar Parliament to consider [Article 205(6)-(7)]. |
Vol I, Article 205 | Strong (for the state aid referred to in Article 201) | Question register, questions 1 and 5 |
| Cohesion financial mechanism | The Cooperation Council is to set up a financial mechanism to promote cohesion between Gibraltar and the frontier zone next to Gibraltar, including on training and employment. Both parties should provide funding.Read the texts on this |
Vol I, Part Five | Conditional (needs a Cooperation Council decision and funding) | Front document section 3; texts volume, Article 299 card |
| UK commitment on termination | The Concordat says that the UK Government will not take the necessary steps towards ending the treaty, other than in the most exceptional circumstances, unless ending it is supported in one of two ways. One is a motion carried by at least three-quarters of the total number of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament. The other is a simple majority of the votes cast in a referendum of all persons entitled to vote in elections to the Gibraltar Parliament. The commitment applies to the use of the treaty's power to end it after the evaluation and of its general power to end it by written notice, and follows full consultation with the Government of Gibraltar.Read the texts on thisThe Concordat says that the UK Government will not take the necessary steps with a view to terminating the treaty, other than in the most exceptional circumstances, unless termination is supported in one of two ways. One is a motion carried by at least three-quarters of the total number of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament. The other is a simple majority of the votes cast in a referendum of all persons entitled to vote in elections to the Gibraltar Parliament. The commitment applies to the exercise of powers under Article 66 or Article 334, and follows full consultation with the Government of Gibraltar [Concordat, Termination and Suspension]. |
Concordat | Conditional (a commitment by the UK Government in the Concordat, which is between the Government of the UK and the Government of Gibraltar and is not part of the treaty; it has an exception for the most exceptional circumstances; the EU and Spain are not parties to the Concordat) | Front document section 1.5 and section 4 item 16A |
| Own nationals and arrest warrants | The UK, for Gibraltar, may notify the on the circulation of persons of either of two things: that the UK's own nationals will not be surrendered, or that their surrender will be authorised only under certain specified conditions. The notification must be based on reasons related to the fundamental principles or practice of the domestic legal order.Read the texts on thisUnder Article 122(2), the UK, for Gibraltar, may notify the EU-UK treaty committee on the circulation of persons of either of two things. One is that the UK's own nationals will not be surrendered. The other is that their surrender will be authorised only under certain specified conditions. The notification must be based on reasons related to the fundamental principles or practice of the domestic legal order [Article 122(2)]. |
Vol I, Article 122 | Strong for the power as worded; it has effect only if the UK, for Gibraltar, makes a notification. None was made: a Legal Notice of 2026 records that the UK, for Gibraltar, makes no notification on this provision. Notifications may be renewed or newly made only in the three months before the fourth anniversary of the treaty's entry into force, and then every five years after that, provided that the conditions for such a notification are met at that time.Read the texts on thisStrong for the power as worded; it has effect only if the UK, for Gibraltar, makes a notification. None was made: records that the UK, for Gibraltar, makes no notification on this provision. Under Article 149, notifications may be renewed or newly made only in the three months before the fourth anniversary of the treaty's entry into force, and then every five years after that, provided that the conditions in Article 122(2) are met at that time [Article 149]. |
Question register, questions 24 and 26 |
| 2020 framework: order of checks | The framework of 31 December 2020 says that the Gibraltar authorities will first decide whether to allow or refuse entry through Gibraltar's entry points, and that the conditions will be cumulative. It also says that entry and exit through them will be allowed only once both Gibraltar and Schengen checks are completed. The treaty provides for the same order of checks on entry. It also provides for cumulative entry conditions (conditions that apply together). That rule on cumulative conditions does not affect two other treaty rules on entry, which are set out in the texts.Read the texts on thisThe framework of 31 December 2020 says that the Gibraltar authorities will first decide on the authorisation or denial of entry through the entry points of Gibraltar, and that the conditions will be cumulative [framework, Annex 1, paragraph 1]. It also says that entry and exit through them will be permitted only on completion of both Gibraltar and Schengen checks [framework, paragraph 5]. Article 29(5) of the treaty provides for the same order of checks on entry. Article 29(7) provides for cumulative entry conditions (conditions that apply together). Article 29(7) does not affect Article 32(3) or Article 43. |
The framework of 31 December 2020 (political; not an instrument) | Political | Texts volume, section H |
Texts behind the row: Removal of the border fence
"All physical barriers related to the circulation of persons between the Union and Gibraltar shall be removed" [Article 28]. The implementation plan of the UK, for Gibraltar, says that its first phase, to be completed before 15 July 2026, includes "the demolition of the border fence in its entirety" [Arrangement , Annex 2].
Texts behind the row: Movement without border checks between Gibraltar and the Schengen States
The Parties "shall ensure that persons may circulate between Gibraltar and the Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full without border checks being carried out, without prejudice to the provisions on sea borders in Annex VI of the Schengen Borders Code, irrespective of their nationality" [Article 30(1)]. Where there is a serious threat to public policy, public health or internal security, those EU countries or the UK, for Gibraltar, "may exceptionally reinstate border control" for up to 10 days; this may be prolonged by 20 days and then by periods of one month, up to six months in all, and only "as a last resort" [Article 30(2)]. In the event of serious non-respect of commitments under Part Two, or where a Party considers that it is exposed to a serious and persistent threat to internal security due to the absence of controls, either Party, after consultations, may temporarily suspend its obligations under Titles I to V of Part Two [Article 67(1)]. For travellers moving between Gibraltar and Spain, routine customs checks "are not required to be carried out"; this is "without prejudice to Article 22(3) of Annex 23 of the Agreement and to any non-discriminatory controls that may be carried out by the customs authorities of Spain, in Spain" [Arrangement , Travellers, paragraph 6.7].
Texts behind the row: Residents of Gibraltar and entry into Gibraltar
Persons resident in Gibraltar who do not meet the other entry conditions of Article 6(1) of the Schengen Borders Code "shall in any event not be prevented from crossing the border crossing points ... for the purpose of entering Gibraltar" [Article 43(2)]. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals who do not meet the entry conditions applies "other than persons resident in Gibraltar, and persons belonging to the categories set out in Article 6(5) of the Schengen Borders Code" [Article 33(4)(a)(ii)].
Texts behind the row: Order of checks on entry; arrest of residents under Article 34
"Border checks on entry shall be carried out by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, and subsequently by" those of Spain; on exit the order is reversed [Article 29(5)]. Where coercive action for arrest or detention is required by Spain's authorities and the person is resident in Gibraltar, "the action may only be carried out by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar"; those authorities "shall", on Spain's request and once they have the information needed for lawful execution, carry out the requested action [Article 34(9)]. Article 33(4)(c)(ii) separately gives Spain's authorities the right to "arrest, search, detain ... where it is justified in the course of border control carried out by the competent authorities of the Kingdom of Spain and in accordance with Spanish, Union and international law". The text does not say how Article 33(4)(c)(ii) and Article 34(9) apply together to residents.
Texts behind the row: Sovereignty clause
The treaty, the arrangements and "any measures or instruments or conduct taken in application or as a result thereof" "shall be without prejudice to, and shall not otherwise affect, the respective legal positions of the United Kingdom ... or of the Kingdom of Spain with regard to sovereignty and jurisdiction" [Article 2]. Part Six (dispute settlement) "does not apply to any disputes with regard to sovereignty and jurisdiction"; if the respondent Party submits a reasoned statement that a request may affect those positions, the arbitration tribunal "shall not decide" on them [Article 301(6)]. Article 2 is also outside the provisions covered by Part Six [Article 301(2)(a)]. Each of the seven arrangements carries a similar clause [Arrangements –, preambles].
Texts behind the row: Customs union and duties
"A customs union between the Union and the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, is hereby established" [Article 240]; "No customs duties on imports or exports or charges having equivalent effect shall be applied between the Union and Gibraltar" [Article 243]; physical barriers for goods moving by land are to be removed, "without prejudice to Article 252 or to formalities required and checks and controls that may be carried out by the Parties to ensure the correct application of this Title" [Article 246(1)]. Until the Cooperation Council adopts the decision in Article 247(1) and that decision enters into force, "Gibraltar shall be regarded as a third territory under Union customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law" [Article 247(5)].
Texts behind the row: Frontier workers: equal treatment
EU citizens legally residing in Spain who are employed frontier workers have equal treatment in Gibraltar, including on remuneration, dismissal, trade-union membership, training and "social and tax advantages, except rights of access to housing" [Article 292(3)]; UK nationals legally residing in Gibraltar have the matching right in Spain [Article 292(2), (4)]. Article 21(1), which says the treaty confers no rights on persons and cannot be invoked directly in domestic legal systems, is stated to be "without prejudice to" Titles I and II of Part Four. Article 21 does not say how individuals may rely on those Titles. Under Article 336(5), Title II of Part Three and Title III of Part Four, among others, cease to apply while the administrative arrangements named there are suspended or terminated; Title II of Part Four is not named there.
Texts behind the row: Social security coordination and Article 316
"Obligations under the Protocol on Social Security Coordination or its Annexes may not be suspended under this Article" [Article 316(3)] (Article 316 covers temporary measures after an arbitration ruling). Frontier workers receive sickness benefits in kind at the place of work [Article SSC.17(1)]; unemployed cross-border workers receive benefit from the state of last employment [Article SSC.56(1)]. Article 316(3) names only Article 316. Article 209(12), on suspension of obligations after remedial measures on state aid, does not mention the Protocol; it says the level of suspension is proposed "in accordance with the principles set out in Article 316", and does not say whether Article 316(3) is one of those principles. Under Article 336(5), Title III of Part Four (social security coordination) ceases to apply from the day the arrangements named there are suspended or terminated, and applies again when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded.
Texts behind the row: State aid by Act of the Gibraltar Parliament
For an intended measure to grant or alter state aid "referred to in Article 201" by an Act of the Gibraltar Parliament, the rule of prior authorisation does not apply [Article 205(6)] and the power of the independent authority to order recovery does not apply [Article 205(7)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must ensure that such an intended measure is notified to its independent authority [Article 205(6)] and that the authority "has the power to issue an opinion"; the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall have regard to such an opinion and, where applicable, propose amendments to the Act in question for the Gibraltar Parliament to consider" [Article 205(6)–(7)].
Texts behind the row: Cohesion financial mechanism
Texts behind the row: UK commitment on termination
The Concordat says the UK Government "will not, other than in the most exceptional circumstances, take the necessary steps with a view of terminating the Agreement unless termination is supported by" a motion carried by at least three-quarters of the total number of Members of the Gibraltar Parliament, or a simple majority of the votes cast in a referendum of all persons entitled to vote in elections to the Gibraltar Parliament. It applies to the exercise of powers under Article 66 or Article 334, and follows "full consultation with the Government of Gibraltar" [Concordat, Termination and Suspension].
Original wording of this cell: Conditional (a commitment by the UK Government in the Concordat, which is between the Government of the UK and the Government of Gibraltar and is not part of the treaty; it has a "most exceptional circumstances" exception; the EU and Spain are not parties to the Concordat)
Texts behind the row: Own nationals and arrest warrants
The UK, for Gibraltar, may notify the EU-UK treaty committee on the circulation of persons that "the United Kingdom's own nationals ... will not be surrendered or that their surrender will be authorised only under certain specified conditions", on reasons "related to the fundamental principles or practice of the domestic legal order" [Article 122(2)].
Original wording of this cell: Strong for the power as worded; it has effect only if the UK, for Gibraltar, makes a notification. None was made: records that "The United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, makes no notification in relation to this provision". Notifications may be "renewed or newly made" only "during the three months prior to the fourth anniversary of the entry into force of this Agreement and, subsequently, every five years thereafter", provided that the conditions in Article 122(2) are met at that time [Article 149]
Texts behind the row: 2020 framework: order of checks
In the framework of 31 December 2020: "The Gibraltar authorities will first decide on the authorization or denial of entry through the entry points of Gibraltar"; the conditions "will be cumulative" [framework, Annex 1, paragraph 1]; "entry and exit through them will only be permitted on completion of both Gibraltar and Schengen checks" [framework, paragraph 5]. Article 29(5) of the treaty provides for the same order of checks on entry, and Article 29(7), "Without prejudice to Article 32(3) and Article 43", for cumulative entry conditions.
The frontier. The treaty says that all physical barriers related to the circulation of persons between the EU and Gibraltar are to be removed. The implementation plan of the UK, for Gibraltar, annexed to the first arrangement, says that its first phase, to be completed before 15 July 2026, includes demolishing the border fence entirely. The treaty says that the parties must ensure that persons may circulate between Gibraltar and the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full, without border checks. This is subject to the sea-border rules of the Schengen Borders Code and to the treaty's rules on reinstating border control and on suspending obligations. For goods, the treaty sets up a customs union between the EU and the UK, for Gibraltar. It prohibits customs duties and charges of equivalent effect between the EU and Gibraltar. It provides for the removal of physical barriers for goods moving by land. This is subject to the formalities, checks and controls it names. Until the Cooperation Council adopts its decision that sets the start date and declares that the border posts and customs offices at the port and airport are set up, working and controlled, and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar is regarded as a third territory for EU customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law. For travellers moving between Gibraltar and Spain, the customs arrangement says that routine customs checks are not required to be carried out. This does not affect a rule in one of the treaty's annexes. It also does not affect any non-discriminatory controls that the customs authorities of Spain may carry out, in Spain.
The frontier. Article 28 says all physical barriers related to the circulation of persons between the EU and Gibraltar "shall be removed". The implementation plan of the UK, for Gibraltar, annexed to the first arrangement, says its first phase, to be completed before 15 July 2026, includes "the demolition of the border fence in its entirety" [Arrangement , Annex 2; Article 28]. Article 30(1) says the Parties "shall ensure that persons may circulate between Gibraltar and the Member States applying the Schengen acquisAcquisThe whole body of European Union (EU) law (treaties, regulations, directives, court judgments) as it stands at any moment. in full without border checks being carried out", subject to the sea-border rules in Annex VI of the Schengen Borders Code and to Articles 30(2) and 67. For goods, Article 240 establishes a customs unionCustoms territory / customs unionThe area within which goods move without customs checks or duties because the members apply one external tariff. Goods from outside clear customs on entry, once, for the whole area. between the EU and the UK, for Gibraltar; Article 243 prohibits customs duties and charges of equivalent effect between the EU and Gibraltar, and Article 246(1) provides for the removal of physical barriers for goods moving by land, subject to the formalities, checks and controls it names. Until the Cooperation CouncilCooperation CouncilThe treaty’s top joint body: the European Union (EU) and the United Kingdom (UK), with Gibraltar’s nominees beside the UK Minister under the Concordat. It supervises the agreement and takes the decisions the treaty reserves to it. adopts the decision in Article 247(1) and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar "shall be regarded as a third territory" for EU customs, indirect taxationIndirect taxTax on spending rather than income (VAT, excise, Gibraltar’s transaction tax), collected by the seller and paid by the buyer in the price. and trade-related law [Article 247(5)]. For travellers moving between Gibraltar and Spain, Arrangement says routine customs checks "are not required to be carried out"; the paragraph is "without prejudice to Article 22(3) of Annex 23 of the Agreement and to any non-discriminatory controls that may be carried out by the customs authorities of Spain, in Spain" [Arrangement , Travellers, paragraph 6.7].
Checks, officers and weapons. The UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain are to set up border crossing points at Gibraltar port and airport. As an exception, the treaty allows border checks to be carried out at the airport crossing point, if the volume of traffic through the port allows an efficient, high and uniform level of control at the airport crossing point. Passengers and crew arriving at the port are then escorted to the airport. An administrative arrangement between the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain says those conditions are considered met in two cases. For ferries, that is where there are no direct ferry connections between Gibraltar and a port outside the Schengen Area. For cruise ships, it is where no cruise ships start or end their itineraries at Gibraltar. On entry, the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, check first and Spain's authorities check after them. On exit the order is reversed. Second line checks must be carried out at the Second Line Checks Area. The texts say the following about who is present and how they are dressed and equipped.
Checks, officers and weapons. The UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain are to set up border crossing points at Gibraltar port and airport [Article 29(1)]. By way of exception, Article 29(3) allows border checks to be carried out at the airport crossing point, if the volume of traffic through the port allows an efficient, high and uniform level of control at the airport crossing point; passengers and crew arriving at the port are then escorted to the airport. Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.2, says the conditions of Article 29(3) are considered met: for ferries, where no direct ferry connections exist between Gibraltar and a port outside the Schengen Area; for cruise ships, where no cruise ships start or end their itineraries at Gibraltar. On entry, the competent authoritiesCompetent authorityThe public body put in charge of a matter. The treaty calls it the “competent authority”. of the UK, for Gibraltar, check first and Spain's authorities "subsequently"; on exit the order is reversed [Article 29(5)]. Second line checks must be carried out at the Second Line Checks Area [Article 29(6)]. The texts say the following about who is present and how they are dressed and equipped.
Paragraph 2.1.4 of Arrangement opens "As a general rule". Under it, Spanish officers within the Schengen immigration booths at the airport "may be in uniform" [Arrangement , paragraph 2.1.4(a)]. The arrangements say nothing about weapons for those officers; paragraph 2.1.4 deals with uniform only.
Under the same general rule, any Spanish official outside the Second Line Checks Area or the Schengen immigration booths at the airport "will be in civilian clothes but suitably identified"; a Spanish officer may be present there to supervise the e-gates and escort passengers, and officials of the UK, for Gibraltar, "may accompany them" [Arrangement , paragraph 2.1.4(b)].
At the port, where the Article 29(3) conditions are not met and Spanish officials need to be present, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "will accompany" them to and from the port and while they are there [Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.3].
Spanish customs officers on joint visits "will be in civilian clothes but suitably identified. They will not carry service weapons"; the customs authorities of both Participants travel to the visit in vehicles provided by the customs authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar [Arrangement , Joint Visits, paragraphs 11.7–11.8]. The same is said of Spanish customs officers where the Article 29(3) conditions are not met and they need to be present in the port to carry out first line checks and controls; the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "will escort" them to and from the port and accompany them while there [Arrangement , Travellers, paragraph 6.4].
Officers of either Participant carrying out continued surveillance in the other's territory "may carry their service weapons during the surveillance save where specifically otherwise decided by the requested Participant; their use will be prohibited save in cases of legitimate self-defence" [Arrangement , paragraph 3.4(c)]. Officers of either Participant in an uninterrupted pursuit "may carry their service weapons; their use will be prohibited save in cases of legitimate self-defence" [Arrangement , paragraph 6.4(d)].
Our reading of “requested Participant”: the side into whose territory the surveillance continues.
Joint maritime patrols: each Participant provides, in alternating weeks, a vessel "neutrally branded and ... marked with the European flag or other agreed visible insignia or wording showing it is performing a Schengen border surveillance function" [Arrangement , paragraph 3.2.4].
Presence and power, in one table.
| Where | Who is present | Clothes (uniform) | Weapons | Power over a person | Gibraltar escort |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airport, inside the Schengen immigration booths | Spanish officers (Arrangement , paragraph 2.1.4(a)) | They may be in uniform. The arrangement describes this as a general rule | The border checks arrangement says nothing about weaponsRead the texts on thisArrangement says nothing about weapons |
The Schengen entry check | Not stated |
| Airport, outside the booths and outside the Second Line Checks Area | A Spanish officer may be present to supervise the e-gates and, where necessary, to escort passengers to the Second Line Checks Area. Schengen checks may be carried out outside the booths where Spain's assessment of risk justifies it.Read the texts on thisA Spanish officer may be present to supervise the e-gates and escort passengers, where necessary, to the Second Line Checks Area (paragraph 2.1.4(b)); Schengen checks may be carried out outside the booths where Spain's assessment of risk justifies it (paragraph 2.3.2) |
Civilian clothes but suitably identified | Not stated | Schengen checks where they are widened as the border checks arrangement allowsRead the texts on thisSchengen checks where they are widened as paragraph 2.3.2 allows |
Gibraltar's officials may accompany them |
| Port: travellers who entered Gibraltar by sea and are going to Spain | Spanish customs officers, where the conditions of the treaty's exception for checks at the port are not met and they need to be at the port; Gibraltar is told in advance, in writing if possible; as a general rule in designated areas (the customs arrangement, travellers part)Read the texts on thisSpanish customs officers, where the conditions in Article 29(3) are not met and they need to be at the port; Gibraltar is told in advance, in writing if possible; as a general rule in designated areas (Arrangement , travellers, paragraph 6.4) |
Civilian clothes but suitably identified | Will not carry service weapons | Not stated | Gibraltar's authorities will escort those officers to and from the port and accompany them while they are at the port |
| Customs joint visits | Spanish customs officers taking part in a joint visit (the customs arrangement)Read the texts on thisSpanish customs officers taking part in a joint visit (Arrangement , paragraphs 11.7 and 11.8) |
Civilian clothes but suitably identified | Will not carry service weapons | Not stated | Not stated; the officers travel in vehicles provided by HM Customs Gibraltar |
| Continued surveillance | Officers of either side, in the other's territory, under the treaty and the surveillance and pursuit arrangementRead the texts on thisOfficers of either side, in the other's territory (Article 55; Arrangement , paragraph 3.4) |
Not stated | May carry service weapons during the surveillance, unless the requested side (our reading: the side into whose territory the surveillance continues) specifically decides otherwise; use is prohibited except in cases of legitimate self-defenceRead the texts on thisMay carry service weapons during the surveillance, unless the requested Participant (our reading: the side into whose territory the surveillance continues) specifically decides otherwise; use is prohibited except in cases of legitimate self-defence (paragraph 3.4(c)) |
May neither challenge nor arrest the person under surveillance; no entry into private homesRead the texts on thisMay neither challenge nor arrest the person under surveillance; no entry into private homes (paragraph 3.4(d) and (e)) |
Not stated |
| Pursuit | Officers of either side, in the other's territory, under the treaty and the surveillance and pursuit arrangementRead the texts on thisOfficers of either side, in the other's territory (Article 56; Arrangement , paragraph 6.4) |
Easily identifiable, either by their uniform, by an armband or by accessories fitted to their vehicles; civilian clothes with unmarked vehicles are prohibitedRead the texts on thisEasily identifiable, either by their uniform, by means of an armband or by accessories fitted to their vehicles; civilian clothes with unmarked vehicles are prohibited (paragraph 6.4(c)) |
May carry service weapons; use is prohibited except in cases of legitimate self-defenceRead the texts on thisMay carry service weapons; use is prohibited except in cases of legitimate self-defence (paragraph 6.4(d)) |
Whether the pursuing officers may hold the person until Gibraltar's officers arrive depends on a declaration from each side; a Gibraltar Legal Notice of 2026, named in the texts on this, prohibits apprehending the person until the declarations are madeRead the texts on thisWhether the pursuing officers may hold the person until Gibraltar's officers arrive depends on a declaration from each side (paragraphs 6.1 and 6.2); Gibraltar's Legal Notice 152/2026 prohibits apprehending the person until the declarations are made |
Not stated |
| Joint maritime patrols | Officers of both sides, under the border checks arrangementRead the texts on thisOfficers of both sides (Arrangement , paragraph 3.2) |
Not stated; each side's vessel is neutrally branded and marked with the European flag or other agreed visible insigniaRead the texts on thisNot stated; each side's vessel is neutrally branded and marked with the European flag or other agreed visible insignia (paragraph 3.2.4) |
Not stated | An arrest is made by the authority of the territory where the person has been caughtRead the texts on thisAn arrest is made by the authority of the territory where the person has been apprehended (paragraph 3.2.5) |
Not stated; the side that provides the vessel changes every weekRead the texts on thisNot stated; the side that provides the vessel changes every week (paragraph 3.2.4) |
Texts behind this table
Airport, inside the Schengen immigration booths, Clothes (uniform): They "may be in uniform". The arrangement describes this as "a general rule"
Airport, outside the booths and outside the Second Line Checks Area, Who is present: A Spanish officer "may be present to supervise the e-gates and escort passengers", where necessary, to the Second Line Checks Area (paragraph 2.1.4(b)); Schengen checks may be carried out outside the booths where Spain's assessment of risk justifies it (paragraph 2.3.2)
Airport, outside the booths and outside the Second Line Checks Area, Clothes (uniform): "civilian clothes but suitably identified"
Airport, outside the booths and outside the Second Line Checks Area, Gibraltar escort: Gibraltar's officials "may accompany" them
Port: travellers who entered Gibraltar by sea and are going to Spain, Clothes (uniform): "civilian clothes but suitably identified"
Port: travellers who entered Gibraltar by sea and are going to Spain, Weapons: "will not carry service weapons"
Port: travellers who entered Gibraltar by sea and are going to Spain, Gibraltar escort: Gibraltar's authorities "will escort those officers to and from the port and accompany them whilst they are at the port"
Customs joint visits, Clothes (uniform): "civilian clothes but suitably identified"
Customs joint visits, Weapons: "will not carry service weapons"
Continued surveillance, Weapons: May carry service weapons during the surveillance, "save where specifically otherwise decided by the requested Participant"; use is prohibited "save in cases of legitimate self-defence" (paragraph 3.4(c))
Continued surveillance, Power over a person: "may neither challenge nor arrest the person under surveillance"; no entry into private homes (paragraph 3.4(d) and (e))
Pursuit, Clothes (uniform): "easily identifiable, either by their uniform, by means of an armband or by accessories fitted to their vehicles"; civilian clothes with unmarked vehicles are prohibited (paragraph 6.4(c))
Pursuit, Weapons: May carry service weapons; use is prohibited "save in cases of legitimate self-defence" (paragraph 6.4(d))
Joint maritime patrols, Clothes (uniform): Not stated; each side's vessel is "neutrally branded" and marked "with the European flag or other agreed visible insignia" (paragraph 3.2.4)
Joint maritime patrols, Power over a person: An arrest is made by the authority of "the territory where the person has been apprehended" (paragraph 3.2.5)
Residents. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals who do not meet the entry conditions does not extend to people resident in Gibraltar. A resident who does not meet the other Schengen entry conditions must in any event not be prevented from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar. A resident who does not meet all the entry conditions must be allowed to enter the territory of EU countries for transit, so that they may reach Gibraltar, with one exception. The exception concerns the EU country whose external borders the resident is seeking to cross. It applies where the resident's name is on that country's national list of alerts and the alert comes with instructions to refuse entry or transit. No entry or exit stamp is affixed to the travel documents of people resident in Gibraltar when they cross the external borders of an EU country, including at the border crossing points the treaty names for Gibraltar. They are exempt from the Entry/Exit System requirements and from the requirement to hold an ETIAS travel authorisation. Where Spain's authorities require coercive action for arrest or detention of a person resident in Gibraltar, the action may be carried out only by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. They carry it out on Spain's request. A separate rule covers alerts that exist only in the databases of one side, where coercive action is required to arrest or detain the person. In that case, the person is not to object to the arrest or detention. Alternatively, the person is to be given a choice. On entry, the choice is to be refused entry. On exit, the choice is to be required to exit. If, after being given the safeguards set out in the border checks arrangement, the person raises a human rights concern about their arrest, detention or removal from the Second Line Checks Area, or there is a conflicting international obligation about extradition, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, will request a stay of removal until the relevant judicial authorities have resolved the matter. This is done by a fast-track process. The treaty deals separately with alerts on both sides where only one authority can act: Spain's authorities then take the action, and in exceptional cases, where there are individual human rights concerns or conflicting international obligations about extradition, the relevant authority may request a stay of arrest and detention. An application for international protection made in Gibraltar is examined by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, subject to further rules in the treaty, including Spain's right to object set out below. A person going through border checks may instead apply to Spain's authorities, who then examine it. Spain's authorities may object within 14 days to a grant of protection by the UK, for Gibraltar. The 14 days may be extended by up to 14 days. After such an objection, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, must not grant protection until they have given full consideration to any information Spain provides.
Residents. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-countryThird countryUsually a country outside the European Union (EU), but the treaty says in each place who counts. In the treaty's chapter on arrest warrants, a “third country” is any country other than an EU country, the United Kingdom (UK) or the UK, for Gibraltar. In the treaty's rule on data protection, references to third countries and their authorities in the EU data protection law the treaty lists do not include the UK, for Gibraltar, or its authorities, as long as the UK, for Gibraltar, has the same rules in its own law and applies them effectively, as the treaty requires. Read the treaty's text in each place to see who counts. nationals who do not meet the entry conditions does not extend to "persons resident in Gibraltar" [Article 33(4)(a)(ii)]. A resident who does not meet the other Schengen entry conditions "shall in any event not be prevented" from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar [Article 43(2)]. A resident who does not meet all the entry conditions "shall be authorised to enter the territory of the Member States for transit purposes so that they may reach Gibraltar, unless their names are on the national list of alerts of the Member State whose external borders they are seeking to cross and the alert is accompanied by instructions to refuse entry or transit" [Article 44]. No entry or exit stamp is affixed to the travel documents of persons resident in Gibraltar when crossing the external borders of an EU country, including the crossing points in Article 29(1); they are exempt from the Entry/Exit System requirements and from the requirement to hold an ETIAS travel authorisation [Article 42]. Where coercive action for arrest or detention of a person resident in Gibraltar is required by Spain's authorities, "the action may only be carried out by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar", which carry it out on Spain's request [Article 34(9)]. Where coercive action for arrest or detention is required on alerts that exist only in the databases of one side, the person "shall not object to the arrest or detention; or alternatively ... shall be given the choice to be refused entry" on entry, or "to be required to exit" on exit [Article 34(5)]. If, after being given the safeguards in Arrangement , paragraph 2.4.1, the person raises a human rights concern about their arrest, detention or removal from the Second Line Checks Area, or there is a conflicting international obligation about extradition, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "will request a stay of removal until the matter has been resolved by the relevant judicial authorities", by a fast-track process [Arrangement , paragraph 2.4.3]. Article 34(7) deals separately with alerts on both sides where only one authority can act: Spain's authorities then take the action, and in exceptional cases, where there are individual human rights concerns or conflicting international obligations about extradition, the relevant authority may request a stay of arrest and detention. An application for international protection made in Gibraltar is examined by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, subject to Article 53(6) to (10) [Article 53(1)]; a person going through border checks may instead apply to Spain's authorities, who then examine it [Article 53(3)–(4)]; Spain's authorities may object within 14 days to a grant of protection by the UK, for Gibraltar (the 14 days may be extended by up to 14 days); the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, must then not grant protection until they have given full consideration to any information Spain provides [Article 53(7)].
Sovereignty. The table sets out the treaty's sovereignty clause and the similar clause in each of the seven arrangements. The treaty's dispute settlement rules do not apply to disputes about sovereignty and jurisdiction. The tribunal must not decide on them once the responding party submits a reasoned statement. The footnote to the treaty's definition of Gibraltar airport carries a similar clause. The treaty also covers a dispute in arbitration that raises a question about how to interpret a concept or a provision of EU law. The concept or provision must be in an EU act that the treaty refers to. The arbitration tribunal does not decide that question. It asks the Court of Justice of the European Union for a ruling, and that ruling binds the tribunal. Subject to another rule of the treaty on interpretation, an interpretation of the treaty given by the courts of one party is not binding on the courts of the other party.
Sovereignty. The sovereignty clause in Article 2 and the similar clause in each of the seven arrangements are set out in the table. Part Six does not apply to disputes about sovereignty and jurisdiction, and the tribunal "shall not decide" on them once the respondent Party submits a reasoned statement [Article 301(6)]. The footnote to the definition of "Gibraltar airport" carries a similar clause [Article 271(d)]. Where a dispute in arbitration "raises a question of interpretation of a concept or a provision of Union law contained in a Union act referred to in this Agreement", the arbitration tribunal does not decide that question; it asks the Court of Justice of the European Union for a ruling, which binds the tribunal [Article 312(1)]. Subject to Article 20, an interpretation of the treaty given by the courts of one Party "shall not be binding on the courts of the other Party" [Article 18(3)].
Economic and institutional provisions. Equal treatment of frontier workers, social security coordination, state aid granted by an Act of the Gibraltar Parliament and the cohesion mechanism are set out in the table. The treaty says each Party must give ships flying the flag of any EU country or of the UK (Gibraltar), or operated by service suppliers of the other Party, treatment no less favourable than it gives its own ships. This covers access to ports, use of port infrastructure, maritime auxiliary services and customs facilities. Residence and identity cards are issued in Gibraltar by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. The UK, for Gibraltar, must tell the Cooperation Council about proposed changes to the conditions for those cards and permits. Within one month, the Council gives its opinion on whether or not the changes are compatible with the treaty. The Concordat states that the UK's obligations were entered into with the consent of the Government of Gibraltar. It states that this followed that Government's full participation in the negotiations. It also states that, where relevant, references in the treaty to the UK, for Gibraltar, are understood to mean the Government of Gibraltar or Gibraltar, depending on the case. It also sets out the commitment on termination that is in the table.
Economic and institutional provisions. Frontier workersFrontier workersPeople who live in Spain and work in Gibraltar.' equal treatment, social security coordination, state aidState aidPublic money or advantage given to a business. It must now be notified before it is paid, and can be challenged. by Act of the Gibraltar Parliament and the cohesion mechanism are set out in the table. Under Article 286 each Party must give ships "flying the flag of any Member State or of the United Kingdom (Gibraltar), or operated by service suppliers of the other Party" treatment "no less favourable than that accorded to its own ships" on access to ports, use of port infrastructure, maritime auxiliary services and customs facilities. Residence and identity cards are issued in Gibraltar by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar [Article 45(1)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the Cooperation Council of changes proposed to the conditions for those cards and permits, and the Council provides "its opinion on whether or not such changes are compatible with this Agreement" within one month [Article 45(4)]. The Concordat states that the UK's obligations "have been entered into with the consent of His Majesty's Government of Gibraltar and following its full participation in the negotiations", that "United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar" is "understood to refer to the Government of Gibraltar or to Gibraltar as the case may be" where relevant, and sets out the termination commitment in the table [Concordat, The treaty; Termination and Suspension].
Termination and suspension. Either party may end the treaty by written notice; it stops being in force on the first day of the twelfth month after the notice. After the evaluation the treaty provides for, the EU (including at Spain's request) and the UK may end it in the same way. Either party may temporarily suspend its obligations under the first five titles of the treaty's part on the circulation of persons, after consultations. It may do this in two cases. The first is where commitments in that part of the treaty are seriously not respected. The second is where a party considers that it faces a serious and persistent threat to internal security because controls are absent. Either participant may end an arrangement by written notice, effective on the first day of the twelfth month after the notice (for example, the arrangement on Schengen border checks and surveillance says so). The participants are the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain.
Termination and suspension. Either Party may terminate the treaty by written notification; it ceases to be in force on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [Article 334]. After the evaluation in Article 65, the EU (including at Spain's request) and the UK may terminate it in the same way [Article 66(1)]. Either Party may temporarily suspend its obligations under Titles I to V of Part Two, after consultations [Article 67(1)]. It may do this in two cases. The first is where commitments under Part Two are seriously not respected. The second is where a Party considers that it faces a serious and persistent threat to internal security because controls are absent. Either Participant may end an arrangement by written notification, effective on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [for example Arrangement , paragraph 4.2]. The Participants are the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain.
Residents who do not meet the other entry conditions "shall in any event not be prevented" from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar [Article 43(2)], and Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationalsThird-country nationalA person who is not a citizen of a European Union (EU) country, including, since 2021, a British citizen. does not extend to them [Article 33(4)(a)(ii)]; where Spain's authorities require arrest or detention of a resident, the action "may only be carried out" by the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar [Article 34(9)]; residents are exempt from the Entry/Exit System and from ETIAS [Article 42]. The text does not say how Article 33(4)(c)(ii) applies to residents (see the table).
On entry, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, check first. As a general rule, Spanish officials at the airport outside the Second Line Checks Area and the Schengen immigration booths are to be in civilian clothes. Spanish customs officers on joint visits are not to carry service weapons. Officers on continued surveillance or in pursuit may carry them under the conditions set out above [Article 29(5); Arrangement , paragraph 2.1.4; Arrangement , paragraphs 3.4(c), 6.4(d); Arrangement , paragraph 11.8].
| Provision | What it says, and where | Instrument | Weight | Elsewhere in this set |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Article 46(2): Spain decides that the individual is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the territory of the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full | Spain tells the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, if two things happen, based on information received under the treaty or on any other information. First, Spain considers that a person resident in Gibraltar is a sufficiently serious threat to public policy or internal security, public health or its international relations. Second, on these grounds, Spain decides that the person is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full. The notice must give the reasons and the means by which the person may appeal the prohibition before a national court of Spain. An appeal is not required to have suspensive effect on a decision to prohibit entry. That means the appeal does not have to stop the decision from applying while the appeal is heard. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the person. It must also take all necessary steps to prevent prohibited travel to the Schengen area, including through police and judicial cooperation with Spain. These rules do not apply to family members of EU citizens and certain other family members. The treaty's text speaks of prohibiting entry where the decision concerns leaving Gibraltar. It does not explain this. It names no appeal route other than a Spanish national court.Read the texts on thisSpain notifies the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, if two things happen, based on information received under paragraph 1 or on any other information. First, Spain considers that a person resident in Gibraltar is a sufficiently serious threat to public policy or internal security, public health or its international relations. Second, on these grounds, Spain decides that the individual is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the territory of the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full. The notification must set out the reasons and the means by which the person concerned may appeal the prohibition before a national court of Spain. An appeal is not required to have suspensive effect on a decision to prohibit entry. That means the appeal does not have to stop the decision from applying while the appeal is heard [Article 46(2)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the person. It must also take all necessary steps to prevent prohibited travel to the Schengen area, including through police and judicial cooperation with Spain [Article 46(3)]. Article 46 does not apply to family members of EU citizens and certain other family members [Article 46(4)]. The text of Article 46(2) says prohibit entry where the decision concerns leaving Gibraltar. It does not explain this. It names no appeal route other than a Spanish national court. |
Vol I, Article 46 | Strong | Front document section 1.1; question register, question 26 |
| Spain's role in residence permits issued in Gibraltar | Before issuing or renewing a residence permit, the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, must notify Spain's competent authorities. Spain may object within 28 days, which can be extended by up to 14. It may do so where the applicant is considered, under the Schengen rules, to be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of an EU country. This includes an objection based on an alert in the Schengen Information System. If Spain objects, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar must not issue or renew the permit. If there is no response within the period, this counts as a positive response. Where there are grounds to object to someone who already holds a permit, Spain must ask for it to be withdrawn. The UK's authorities for Gibraltar must then withdraw it without delay. These rules apply until the Visa Information System starts operating. From then a later rule applies. It keeps the notification to Spain and adds rules on collecting visa-system data and sending it to Spain. The rules above on notice, objection and withdrawal do not apply to EU citizens and their family members, referred to in the EU's rules on the free movement of its citizens. Nor do they apply to nationals of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, Andorra and San Marino and their family members who have equivalent free-movement rights under agreements with the EU. The same is true of the matching rules that apply once the Visa Information System starts. For permits already in force, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar notify the holders to Spain. Spain may ask for withdrawal where a holder is considered to be a threat. Except for the persons the treaty leaves out of this rule, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar must then withdraw the permit, subject to a right of appeal in a national court.Read the texts on thisBefore issuing or renewing a residence permit, the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, must notify Spain's competent authorities [Article 50(2)]. Spain may object within 28 days (extendable by up to 14). It may do so where the applicant is considered, in accordance with the Schengen rules, to be a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of an EU country. This includes an objection based on an alert in the Schengen Information System. If Spain objects, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar must not issue or renew the residence permit. If there is no response within the period, this counts as a positive response [Article 50(3)–(4)]. Where there are grounds to object to a holder, Spain must request withdrawal. The UK's authorities for Gibraltar must then withdraw the residence permit without delay [Article 50(5)]. Article 50 applies until Visa Information System operations start. From that date Article 51 applies. It keeps the notification to Spain and adds rules on collecting and sending visa-system data to Spain [Article 50(10); Article 51]. Paragraphs 2 to 6 of Article 50 do not apply to EU citizens and their family members, referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2004/38/EC. Nor do they apply to nationals of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, Andorra and San Marino and their family members who have equivalent free-movement rights under agreements with the EU. The same is true of paragraphs 2 to 7 of Article 51 [Article 50(12); Article 51(11)]. For permits already in force, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar notify the holders to Spain. Spain may request withdrawal where the holder is considered to be a threat. Except for the persons in Article 52(4), the UK's authorities for Gibraltar must withdraw the relevant residence permit, subject to a right of appeal in a national court [Article 52(3)]. |
Vol I, Articles 50–52 | Strong | Front document section 1.1; question register, questions 2 and 26 |
| Conditions for Gibraltar cards and permits | Identity cards and residence permits may be issued only to a person who meets certain conditions. These are the conditions set out in the law in force on the date the treaty enters into force. The UK, for Gibraltar, must tell the Cooperation Council about proposed changes to the conditions for those cards and permits. The Council gives its opinion within one month on whether they are compatible with the treaty. This rule does not say what follows if the opinion is that a change is not compatible. In any event, changes must not allow an identity card on the basis of earlier residence unless the person has been resident for a continuous period of at least 10 years immediately before the date of application. In any event, changes must also not allow a residence permit unless the person can show a genuine connection with Gibraltar. The conditions for a card on any basis other than earlier residence, and for a permit, must not be met on the basis of predetermined investments or predetermined financial payments. Long-stay visas valid for Gibraltar must not be issued.Read the texts on thisIdentity cards and residence permits may be issued only to a person who meets certain conditions. Article 45(2) refers to the conditions set out in the legislation in force on the date of entry into force of the treaty [Article 45(2)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the Cooperation Council of proposed changes to the conditions for those cards and permits. The Council gives its opinion within one month on whether they are compatible with the treaty. Article 45 does not say what follows if the opinion is that a change is not compatible. Changes must not, in any event, allow an identity card on the basis of prior residence unless the person has been resident for a continuous period of at least 10 years immediately prior to the date of application. Changes must also not, in any event, allow a residence permit unless the person can show a genuine connection with Gibraltar [Article 45(4)]. The conditions for a card on a basis other than prior residence, and for a permit, must not be met on the basis of predetermined investments or predetermined financial payments [Article 45(6)]. Long-stay visas valid for Gibraltar must not be issued [Article 49]. |
Vol I, Articles 45, 49 | Strong | Front document section 1.1 |
| EU databases and IT access | The competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, have no access to information systems and databases set up under EU law. They have access to the EU transit and proof of EU status system, or to the specific transit system in the treaty's annexes, through Spain's IT system. The competent authorities within the EU are to have real-time and continuous access to any relevant IT systems used by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, for applying these treaty rules. The customs arrangement says that user IDs or equivalent procedures are to be supplied to Spain. This is to get real-time access to the port, airport and taxation systems of the UK, for Gibraltar, that the treaty's annexes cover.Read the texts on thisThe competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, have no access to information systems and databases established on the basis of EU law [Article 31]. They have access to the EU transit and proof of EU status system, or to the specific transit system in Annexes 19 and 21, through Spain's IT system [Article 251(1)]. The competent authorities within the EU are to have real time and continuous access to any relevant IT systems used by the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, for the application of this Title [Article 251(2)]. Arrangement , IT, paragraph 9, says that user IDs or equivalent procedures are to be supplied to Spain. This is to get real-time access to the port, airport and taxation systems of the UK, for Gibraltar, in scope of Annexes 19, 21, 22 and 23 of the treaty. |
Vol I, Articles 31, 251; Arrangement | Strong | Front document paragraph 1.3 and section 1.4 |
| Article 19(5): subsequent EU acts | The EU gives notice of a later EU act of a kind the treaty lists. Within 30 days, the UK, for Gibraltar, gives notice of its decision on whether to accept and implement it. The cases are these: if it notifies that it does not accept the content; if it does not notify within 30 days; or if it does not inform the EU within six weeks after the act enters into force that it has implemented it. In those cases the treaty is considered ended, unless the Cooperation Council, after a careful examination of ways to continue the treaty, decides otherwise within 90 days. The ending takes effect three months after the end of the 90-day period. The Cooperation Council decides by mutual consent.Read the texts on thisThe EU gives notice of a later EU act of a kind listed in Article 19(1)(b). Within 30 days, the UK, for Gibraltar, gives notice of its decision on whether to accept and implement it [Article 19(2)–(3)]. The cases are these: if it notifies that it does not accept the content; if it does not notify within 30 days; or if it does not inform the EU within six weeks after the act enters into force that it has implemented it. In those cases the treaty is considered terminated, unless the Cooperation Council, after a careful examination of ways to continue the treaty, decides otherwise within 90 days. Termination takes effect three months after the end of the 90-day period [Article 19(5)]. The Cooperation Council decides by mutual consent [Article 24(2)]. |
Vol I, Articles 19, 24 | Strong | Front document section 4 item 14; short version spread 10 |
| Termination after the evaluation; the Declaration | The evaluation the treaty provides for is to be completed by the EU-UK treaty committee on the circulation of persons at the latest four years after the treaty's part on the circulation of persons comes into force. After that evaluation, the EU, including at the request of Spain, and the UK may end the treaty by written notice through diplomatic channels. This does not affect the treaty's general rule letting either party end it by written notice. The treaty stops being in force on the first day of the twelfth month after the notice. Where Spain has asked the EU to end the treaty, the EU must take the necessary steps under its internal procedures, with a view to ending the treaty. The declaration of the EU Council and the Commission says that any measure the EU takes in implementing the treaty will require Spain's prior agreement. It says this includes amendments, remedial measures, suspending the application of all or parts of the treaty, and ending it. It adds that this does not affect the powers of the EU or the special rights of its institutions.Read the texts on thisThe evaluation in Article 65 is to be completed by the EU-UK treaty committee on the circulation of persons at the latest four years after Part Two comes into force. After that evaluation, the EU, including at the request of Spain, and the UK may terminate the treaty by written notification through diplomatic channels. This does not affect Article 334. The treaty ceases to be in force on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [Article 66(1)]. Where Spain has requested the EU to terminate the treaty, the EU must take the necessary steps in accordance with its internal procedures, with a view to terminating the treaty [Article 66(2)]. The Declaration of the Council and the Commission says that any measure taken by the EU in the implementation of the EU-UK Agreement on Gibraltar will require a prior agreement of Spain. It says this includes amendments, remedial measures, suspension of application of all or parts of the treaty, and termination. It adds that this does not affect the powers of the EU or the special rights of its institutions. |
Vol I, Article 66; Declaration | Strong for the treaty's rule on ending the treaty after the evaluation, as worded. The declaration is a statement by two EU institutions, not a term of the treatyRead the texts on thisStrong for Article 66 as worded. The Declaration is a statement by two EU institutions, not a term of the treaty |
Short version spread 10 |
| Suspension of obligations | Either Party, after consulting the other, may temporarily suspend carrying out its obligations under the first five titles of this part of the treaty. It may do so if there is serious non-respect of commitments under this part, or where either Party considers that it faces a serious and persistent threat to internal security because there are no controls between the EU and Gibraltar. The EU will take Spain's opinion duly into account. The notice states how long the suspension lasts. The suspension takes effect on the eighth day of the notice, or on any later date the notice sets. The EU countries, and the UK, for Gibraltar, must bring back border control.Read the texts on thisEither Party, after consultations with each other, may temporarily suspend the implementation of its obligations under Titles I to V of this Part. It may do so in the event of serious non-respect of commitments under this Part, or where either Party considers that it is exposed to a serious and persistent threat to internal security due to the absence of controls between the EU and Gibraltar. The EU will take the opinion of Spain duly into account [Article 67(1)]. The notification states the period. The suspension takes effect on the eighth day of the notification, or on any later date the notification specifies. The EU countries, and the UK for Gibraltar, must reinstate border control [Article 67(2)]. |
Vol I, Article 67 | Strong | Front document section 4 item 17 |
| Termination of an arrangement; Article 336(5) | Each of the seven administrative arrangements says that either Participant may end it by written notice. It then stops having effect on the first day of the twelfth month after the notice. The treaty says that a list of its titles stops applying from the day on which certain administrative arrangements are suspended or terminated. These are the arrangements that the treaty and its social security coordination protocol refer to. The titles start applying again when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded. The Participants are the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain. The text does not say whether the suspension or termination of one of those arrangements is enough, or all must be suspended or terminated.Read the texts on thisEach arrangement says that either Participant may end the arrangement by written notification. It then ceases to have effect on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [Arrangements –, final provisions; for example Arrangement , paragraph 4.2]. Under Article 336(5), Titles I to IV of Part Two, Title II of Part Three and Title III of Part Four cease to apply from the day on which certain administrative arrangements are suspended or terminated. These are the arrangements referred to in Articles 29, 33, 38, 55, 56, 251, 260 and 265 of the treaty and in the Protocol on Social Security Coordination. The titles start applying again when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded. The Participants are the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain. The text of Article 336(5) does not say whether the suspension or termination of one of those arrangements is enough, or all must be suspended or terminated. |
Arrangements; Vol I, Article 336(5) | Strong for the words of both provisions; the point just mentioned is not stated | Front document section 4 item 12; short version spread 16 |
| Indirect tax rates | Until the EU-UK Cooperation Council adopts its decision that sets the start date and declares that the border posts and customs offices at the port and airport are set up, working and controlled, and that decision enters into force, goods produced in or imported into Gibraltar are liable to a transaction tax. Goods subject to harmonised EU excise duties are also liable to an excise duty in Gibraltar. Both are charged under the treaty's annex on these taxes. The standard transaction tax rate is to be no lower than the lowest standard VAT rate applied by an EU country. When the treaty was signed, that lowest rate was 17%. The UK, for Gibraltar, may increase its standard rate gradually over three years. A table sets the steps at 15%, 16% and 17%. The table adds, in brackets: or the lowest rate applied by any EU country at that time. For goods or categories of goods, the independent consultative body may recommend a lower rate. That rate would never be lower than two percentage points below the lowest standard rate of VAT applied by any EU country. After the three years, if the body's recommendations for selected goods are not enough to avoid significant actual distortions in Gibraltar or the area next to the frontier linked to the difference between the transaction tax rates and Spain's VAT rates, it may recommend that the standard rate be adjusted upwards or downwards for all goods subject to that rate. The text does not state whether the two-point limit applies to that adjustment. As for excise duties, EU minimum excise rates apply when the treaty comes into force. Within three years, target excise rates apply that do not differ by more than six percentage points from, or are equal to, 94% of the excise rates applied in Spain. The same annex makes exceptions for fuel and for manufactured tobacco. New EU excise duties apply in Gibraltar unless the independent consultative body recommends a temporary suspension of up to one year. For cigarettes, the annex sets a limit on the price difference resulting from the overall excise duty that applies. That difference must not be more than EUR 0.80 or 15% per packet of cigarettes, whichever leads to the lower price difference. The text does not say what the difference is measured against. If the consultative body establishes a distortion, the UK, for Gibraltar, must adjust its rates according to the recommendations of the body, and within the limits the annex sets for the transaction tax rate and the excise rates.Read the texts on thisUntil the Cooperation Council decision in Article 247(1) enters into force, goods produced in or imported into Gibraltar are liable to a transaction tax. Goods subject to harmonised EU excise duties are also liable to an excise duty in Gibraltar. Both are charged under Annex 24 [Article 248(1)–(4)]. The standard transaction tax rate is to be no lower than the lowest standard VAT rate applied by an EU country. When the treaty was signed, that lowest rate was 17%. The UK, for Gibraltar, may increase its standard rate gradually over three years. A table sets the steps at 15%, 16% and 17%. The table adds, in brackets: or the lowest rate applied by any EU country at that time [Annex 24, Article 2(3)(a)]. For goods or categories of goods, the independent consultative body may recommend a lower rate. That rate would never be lower than two percentage points below the lowest standard rate of VAT applied by any EU country. After the three years, if the body's recommendations for selected goods are not enough to avoid significant actual distortions in Gibraltar or the area next to the frontier linked to the difference between the transaction tax rates and Spain's VAT rates, it may recommend that the standard rate be adjusted upwards or downwards for all goods subject to that rate. The text does not state whether the two-point limit applies to that adjustment. As for excise duties, EU minimum excise rates apply at entry into force. Within three years, target excise rates apply that do not diverge by more than six percentage points from, or are equivalent to, 94% of the excise rates applied in Spain [Annex 24, Article 6(2)]. Annex 24, Article 6(3) to (5) make exceptions for fuel and for manufactured tobacco. New EU excise duties apply in Gibraltar unless the independent consultative body recommends a temporary suspension of up to one year [Annex 24, Article 6(1)]. For cigarettes, Annex 24, Appendix 2, Section 3, paragraph 3 sets a limit on the price difference resulting from the applicable overall excise duty. That difference must not be more than EUR 0,80 or 15% per packet of cigarettes, whichever leads to the lower price difference. The text does not say what the difference is measured against. If the consultative body establishes a distortion, the UK, for Gibraltar, must adjust its rates according to the recommendations of the body, and within the limits of Articles 2 and 6 of Annex 24 [Article 248(6)]. |
Vol II, Annex 24; Vol I, Article 248 | Strong | Short version spreads 4–6; texts volume, Annex 24 |
| EU safeguard procedure on VAT and excise | There are two separate grounds. Under the first, the EU may use the safeguard procedure if three things are true. First, the UK, for Gibraltar, does not meet its obligation in relation to the consultative body's ongoing assessment. Second, the EU considers it appropriate. Third, four conditions are met. Significant distortions in trade between Gibraltar and the EU are occurring for the good or category of goods. They are linked to differences between Gibraltar's transaction tax and excise and Spain's VAT and excise. They have existed for at least 30 days. The EU has objective, compelling and verifiable information showing this. Under the second ground, the EU may use it if two things are both true. First, the UK, for Gibraltar, does not meet the same obligation in relation to the body's annual assessment. Second, the EU considers it appropriate. The second ground lists no further conditions. After notice and 10 working days of consultations without a mutually acceptable solution, the EU may, for a period not longer than 30 days, charge the applicable VAT and excise when opening the transit procedure for goods destined for Gibraltar, at the rate of the EU country of the designated customs post. The 30 days may be extended by a further 30 days, on at least four working days' notice. The process may be repeated while the conditions persist. While the EU charges them, the obligation on the UK, for Gibraltar, to charge transaction tax and excise on those goods does not apply. The amounts must be kept by that EU country. If the UK, for Gibraltar, starts arbitration to challenge the EU's act, the tribunal treats it as urgent.Read the texts on thisThere are two separate grounds. Under Article 249(1), the EU may use the safeguard procedure if three things are true. First, the UK, for Gibraltar, does not comply with its obligation under Article 248(6). That obligation relates to the consultative body's ongoing assessment (Article 248(5)(a)). Second, the EU considers it appropriate. Third, four conditions are met. Significant distortions in trade between Gibraltar and the EU are occurring for the good or category of goods. They are linked to differences between Gibraltar's transaction tax and excise and Spain's VAT and excise. They have existed for at least 30 days. The EU has objective, compelling and verifiable information showing this. Under Article 249(2), the EU may use it if two things are both true. First, the UK, for Gibraltar, does not comply with Article 248(6) on the body's annual assessment. That annual assessment is the one in Article 248(5)(b). Second, the EU considers it appropriate. Paragraph 2 lists no further conditions. After notification and 10 working days of consultations without a mutually acceptable solution, the EU may, for a period not longer than 30 days, charge the applicable VAT and excise when opening the transit procedure for goods destined for Gibraltar, at the rate of the EU country of the designated customs post [Article 249(3)–(4)]. The 30 days may be extended by a further 30 days, on at least four working days' notice. The process may be repeated while the conditions persist [Article 249(5)–(7)]. While the EU charges them, the obligation on the UK, for Gibraltar, to charge transaction tax and excise on those goods does not apply [Article 249(9)]. The amounts must be kept by that EU country [Article 249(11)]. If the UK, for Gibraltar, starts arbitration to challenge the EU's act, the tribunal treats it as urgent [Article 249(8)]. |
Vol I, Article 249 | Conditional (needs a failure to comply with a named treaty rule, the EU's decision to act and four conditions the treaty sets)Read the texts on thisConditional (needs non-compliance with Article 248(6), the EU's decision to act and, under paragraph 1, the four conditions) |
Front document section 7; short version spread 16 |
| Arms and military items for the armed forces, police and public authorities in Gibraltar | Transfers of items on the Common Military List and of Category A, B and C firearms are subject to the rules of Spanish law on export controls of defence and dual-use material. This applies when the items are destined for the armed forces, the police, or the public authorities of the UK in Gibraltar. Spain is to require an authorisation for transfers of these items. Spain's competent authority may refuse to grant a transfer authorisation and may annul, suspend, modify or revoke one it has granted. It may do so in line with two EU regulations named in the texts. Some items are governed only by a special procedure in the treaty. These are items that arrive on State aircraft, State vessels or in State consignments and are destined only for the official use of the UK's Ministry of Defence or of visiting third-country forces. Goods transferred for commercial purposes and sanitary and phytosanitary goods are excepted. Before the transfer, a list and a certificate are given to Spain's Liaison Officer.Read the texts on thisTransfers of items on the Common Military List and Category A, B and C firearms are subject to the rules of Spanish law on export controls of defence and dual-use material. This applies when the items are destined for the armed forces, the police, or the public authorities of the UK in Gibraltar. Spain is to impose an authorisation requirement on the transfers of these items [Article 261(1)]. Spain's competent authority may refuse to grant a transfer authorisation and may annul, suspend, modify or revoke one it has granted [Article 263(3)]. It may do so in line with Regulations (EU) No 258/2012 and (EU) 2025/41 [Article 263(3)]. Some items are regulated exclusively by the special procedure of Article 264. These are items that arrive on State aircraft, State vessels or in State consignments and are destined exclusively for the official use of the UK's Ministry of Defence or visiting third-country forces. Goods transferred for commercial purposes and sanitary and phytosanitary goods are excepted. Before the transfer, a list and a certificate are given to Spain's Liaison Officer [Article 264(1)–(2)]. |
Vol I, Articles 261–264 | Strong | Front document section 4 item 13A; question register, questions 7 and 28 |
| Airport joint venture company | A joint venture company is to be set up under the shared responsibility of the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain. It is not to be set up in either state sharing responsibility for it. It is to be set up in an EU country. It selects, through regular public tender, and supervises the commercial company managing the airport day to day.Read the texts on thisA joint venture company is to be set up under the shared responsibility of the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain. It is not to be set up in either state sharing responsibility for it. It is to be set up in an EU country [Article 274(1)]. It selects, through regular public tender, and supervises the commercial company managing the airport day to day [Article 274(1)]. |
Vol I, Article 274 | Strong | Question register, question 22 |
| Cruise ships and the port | The border checks arrangement says that the UK, for Gibraltar, will ensure that no cruise liners call into Gibraltar directly from third countries. This does not cover cruise liners coming directly from the UK. That sentence is in a paragraph that begins by referring to cases where certain conditions in the treaty are met. The text does not say whether the sentence applies only while those conditions are met. Those conditions are considered to have been met for cruise ships where no cruise ships start or end their itineraries at Gibraltar. Where those conditions are not met, a different paragraph of the arrangement applies.Read the texts on thisArrangement , paragraph 2.2.1, says that the UK, for Gibraltar, will ensure that no cruise liners call into Gibraltar directly from third countries. This does not cover cruise liners coming directly from the UK [Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.1]. That sentence is in a paragraph that begins by referring to cases where the conditions in Article 29(3) of the treaty are met. The text does not say whether the sentence applies only while those conditions are met. The conditions of Article 29(3) are considered to have been met for cruise ships where no cruise ships start or end their itineraries at Gibraltar [Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.2]. Where the Article 29(3) conditions are not met, paragraph 2.2.3 applies. |
Arrangement | Strong | Front document paragraph 1.3; question register, questions 2 and 18 |
| 2020 framework compared with the signed text on termination | The framework of 31 December 2020 says that the treaty may establish a reasonable implementation period. It then says that if, after consultations on the results of the arrangements of the implementation period, either of the parts is not satisfied with the results at the end of that period, the agreement will be terminated at the end of that period. The treaty provides for an evaluation by the EU-UK treaty committee at the latest four years after the treaty's part on the circulation of persons comes into force. It also provides that the EU, including at the request of Spain, or the UK may choose to end the treaty. The framework refers to Spanish officers in the port and airport. It says that during the implementation period Spain, in agreement with the Gibraltar authorities, is to request operational assistance from the European Border and Coast Guard Agency. The word Frontex and the words European Border and Coast Guard do not appear in the treaty or in the seven arrangements.Read the texts on thisThe 2020 text says that the treaty may establish a reasonable implementation period. It then says that if, after consultations on the results of the arrangements of the implementation period, either of the parts is not satisfied with the results at the end of that period, the agreement will be terminated at the end of that period [framework, paragraph 10]. The treaty provides for an evaluation by the EU-UK treaty committee at the latest four years after Part Two comes into force [Article 65]. It also provides for optional termination by the EU, including at the request of Spain, or by the UK [Article 66]. The 2020 text refers to Spanish officers in the port and airport. It says that during the implementation period Spain, in agreement with the Gibraltar authorities, is to request operational assistance from the European Border and Coast Guard Agency [framework, paragraph 10]. The word Frontex and the words European Border and Coast Guard do not appear in the treaty or in the seven arrangements. |
The framework of 31 December 2020 (political; not an instrument); Vol I, Articles 65–66 | Political for the 2020 text; strong for the Articles as worded | Texts volume, section H |
Texts behind the row: Article 46(2): Spain decides that the individual is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the territory of the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full
Provision, as it was: Article 46(2): Spain “decides that the individual is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the territory of the Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full”
If Spain, on information received under paragraph 1 or on any other information, "considers that a person resident in Gibraltar constitutes a sufficiently serious threat to public policy or internal security, public health or its international relations, and on these grounds decides that the individual is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel to the territory of the Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full", it notifies the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. The notification must set out the reasons and "the means by which the person concerned may appeal the prohibition before a national court of the Kingdom of Spain"; an appeal "shall not be required to have suspensive effect on a decision to prohibit entry" [Article 46(2)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the person and "take all necessary steps to prevent prohibited travel to the Schengen area, including through police and judicial cooperation with the Kingdom of Spain" [Article 46(3)]. Article 46 does not apply to family members of EU citizens and certain other family members [Article 46(4)]. The text of Article 46(2) says "prohibit entry" where the decision concerns leaving Gibraltar; it does not explain this. It names no appeal route other than a Spanish national court.
Texts behind the row: Spain's role in residence permits issued in Gibraltar
Before issuing or renewing a residence permit, the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall notify" Spain's [Article 50(2)]. Within 28 days (extendable by up to 14) Spain "may" object where the applicant "is considered, in accordance with the Schengen acquis, to be a threat to public policy ... internal security, public health or the international relations of a Member State", including on the basis of an alert in the Schengen Information System; the UK's authorities for Gibraltar then "shall not issue or renew the residence permit"; no response within the period "shall be considered a positive response" [Article 50(3)–(4)]. Where there are grounds to object to a holder, Spain "shall request" withdrawal and the UK's authorities for Gibraltar "shall withdraw the residence permit without delay" [Article 50(5)]. Article 50 applies until Visa Information System operations start; from that date Article 51 applies, which keeps the notification to Spain and adds rules on collecting and sending visa-system data to Spain [Article 50(10); Article 51]. Paragraphs 2 to 6 of Article 50 and 2 to 7 of Article 51 do not apply to EU citizens and their family members, referred to in Articles 2 and 3 of Directive 2004/38/EC, or to nationals of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland, Andorra and San Marino and their family members who have equivalent free-movement rights under agreements with the EU [Article 50(12); Article 51(11)]. For permits already in force, the UK's authorities for Gibraltar notify the holders to Spain, and Spain "may ... request" withdrawal where the holder "is considered ... to be a threat"; the UK's authorities for Gibraltar "shall withdraw the relevant residence permit subject to a right of appeal in a national court" [Article 52(3)], except for the persons in Article 52(4).
Texts behind the row: Conditions for Gibraltar cards and permits
Identity cards and residence permits may be issued "only to a person who meets the conditions ... set out in the legislation in force on the date of entry into force of this Agreement" [Article 45(2)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, must inform the Cooperation Council of proposed changes, and the Council gives its opinion on whether they are compatible with the treaty within one month; Article 45 does not say what follows if the opinion is that a change is not compatible; changes "shall not, in any event" allow an identity card on the basis of prior residence unless the person has been resident "for a continuous period of at least 10 years immediately prior to the date of application", or a residence permit unless the person can show "a genuine connection with Gibraltar" [Article 45(4)]. The conditions for a card on a basis other than prior residence, and for a permit, "shall not be met" on the basis of predetermined investments or predetermined financial payments [Article 45(6)]. "Long-stay visas valid for Gibraltar shall not be issued" [Article 49].
Texts behind the row: EU databases and IT access
The competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall have no access to information systems and databases established on the basis of Union law" [Article 31]. They have access to the EU transit and proof of EU status system, or to the specific transit system in Annexes 19 and 21, through Spain's IT system [Article 251(1)]. The competent authorities within the EU "shall have real time and continuous access to any relevant IT systems used by the competent authorities of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, for the application of this Title" [Article 251(2)]. Arrangement , IT, paragraph 9: “In order to get real-time access to the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, port, airport and taxation systems in scope of Annexes 19, 21, 22 and 23 of the Agreement user IDs or equivalent procedures shall be supplied to Spain”.
Texts behind the row: Article 19(5): subsequent EU acts
The EU notifies a subsequent EU act of the kinds in Article 19(1)(b); within 30 days the UK, for Gibraltar, notifies its decision whether to accept and implement it [Article 19(2)–(3)]. If it notifies that it does not accept the content, does not notify within 30 days, or does not inform the EU within six weeks after the act enters into force that it has implemented it, "this Agreement shall be considered terminated unless the Cooperation Council, after a careful examination of ways to continue the Agreement, decides otherwise within 90 days"; termination "shall take effect three months after the expiry of the 90-day period" [Article 19(5)]. The Cooperation Council decides "by mutual consent" [Article 24(2)].
Texts behind the row: Termination after the evaluation; the Declaration
After the evaluation in Article 65 (to be completed by the EU-UK treaty committee on the circulation of persons at the latest four years after Part Two comes into force), and without prejudice to Article 334, "the Union, including at the request of the Kingdom of Spain, and the United Kingdom may terminate this Agreement by written notification through diplomatic channels"; it ceases to be in force on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [Article 66(1)]. "Where the Kingdom of Spain has requested the Union to terminate this Agreement ... the Union shall take the necessary steps in accordance with its internal procedures, with a view to terminating this Agreement" [Article 66(2)]. The Declaration of the Council and the Commission says that "any measure taken by the Union in the implementation of the EU-UK Agreement on Gibraltar – including amendments, remedial measures, suspension of application of all or parts of the Agreement and termination - will require a prior agreement of the Kingdom of Spain, without prejudice to the competences of the Union and the prerogatives of the institutions".
Texts behind the row: Suspension of obligations
"In the event of serious non-respect of commitments under this Part, or where either Party considers that it is exposed to a serious and persistent threat to internal security due to the absence of controls between the Union and Gibraltar, either Party, after consultations with each other, may temporarily suspend the implementation of its obligations under Titles I to V of this Part"; "The Union will take the opinion of the Kingdom of Spain duly into account" [Article 67(1)]. The notification states the period; the suspension "shall take effect on the eighth day of the notification or on any later date as specified therein"; the EU countries and the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall reinstate border control" [Article 67(2)].
Texts behind the row: Termination of an arrangement; Article 336(5)
Each arrangement: "Either Participant may terminate this Arrangement by written notification"; it ceases to be in effect on the first day of the twelfth month following the notification [Arrangements –, final provisions; for example Arrangement , paragraph 4.2]. Under Article 336(5), Titles I to IV of Part Two, Title II of Part Three and Title III of Part Four "shall cease to apply as from the day on which the administrative arrangements referred to in Articles 29, 33, 38, 55, 56, 251, 260 and 265 of this Agreement and in the Protocol on Social Security Coordination are suspended or terminated"; they "start applying anew" when the suspension is lifted or new arrangements are concluded. The Participants are the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain. The text of Article 336(5) does not say whether the suspension or termination of one of those arrangements is enough, or all must be suspended or terminated.
Texts behind the row: Indirect tax rates
Until the Cooperation Council decision in Article 247(1) enters into force, goods produced in or imported into Gibraltar are liable to a transaction tax and, for goods subject to harmonised EU excise duties, to an excise duty in Gibraltar, levied under Annex 24 [Article 248(1)–(4)]. The standard transaction tax rate is to be "not less than the lowest standard VAT rate applied by a Member State, which at the time of signature of this Agreement is 17 %"; the UK, for Gibraltar, "may gradually increase its standard rate" over three years, in a table of 15%, 16% and 17% "(or such rate as may be the lowest applied by any Member State at that time)" [Annex 24, Article 2(3)(a)]. For goods or categories of goods, the independent consultative body may recommend a lower rate that "would never be lower than two percentage points below the lowest standard rate of VAT applied by any Member State"; after the three years, if its recommendations for selected goods are not enough to avoid significant actual distortions in Gibraltar or the area next to the frontier linked to the difference between the transaction tax rates and Spain's VAT rates, it may recommend that the standard rate be adjusted upwards or downwards for all goods subject to that rate; the text does not state whether the two-point limit applies to that adjustment. Excise duties: EU minimum excise rates apply at entry into force, and "target excise rates not diverging by more than six percentage points from or being equivalent to 94 % of the excise rates applied in the Kingdom of Spain" apply within three years [Annex 24, Article 6(2)]; Annex 24, Article 6(3) to (5) make exceptions for fuel and for manufactured tobacco. New EU excise duties apply in Gibraltar "unless the independent consultative body recommends ... a temporary suspension of up to one year" [Annex 24, Article 6(1)]. For cigarettes, "the price difference resulting from the applicable overall excise duty shall not exceed EUR 0,80 or 15 % per packet of cigarettes, whichever leads to the lower price differential" [Annex 24, Appendix 2, Section 3, paragraph 3]; the text does not say what the difference is measured against. If the consultative body establishes a distortion, the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall adjust" its rates "according to the recommendations" of the body and within the limits of Articles 2 and 6 of Annex 24 [Article 248(6)].
Texts behind the row: EU safeguard procedure on VAT and excise
There are two separate grounds. Under Article 249(1), the EU "may use" the safeguard procedure if the UK, for Gibraltar, does not comply with its obligation under Article 248(6) in relation to the consultative body's ongoing assessment (Article 248(5)(a)), the EU considers it appropriate, and four conditions are met: significant distortions in trade between Gibraltar and the EU are occurring for the good or category of goods; they are linked to differences between Gibraltar's transaction tax and excise and Spain's VAT and excise; they have existed for at least 30 days; and the EU has objective, compelling and verifiable information showing this. Under Article 249(2), the EU may use it if the UK, for Gibraltar, does not comply with Article 248(6) in relation to the body's annual assessment (Article 248(5)(b)) and the EU considers it appropriate; paragraph 2 lists no further conditions. After notification and 10 working days of consultations without a mutually acceptable solution, the EU "may, for a period not longer than 30 days, levy the VAT and excise applicable" when opening the transit procedure for goods destined for Gibraltar, at the rate of the EU country of the designated customs post [Article 249(3)–(4)]. The 30 days may be extended by a further 30 days, on at least four working days' notice, and the process may be repeated while the conditions persist [Article 249(5)–(7)]. While the EU levies them, the obligation on the UK, for Gibraltar, to levy transaction tax and excise on those goods does not apply [Article 249(9)]. The amounts "shall be kept by that Member State" [Article 249(11)]. If the UK, for Gibraltar, starts arbitration to challenge the EU's act, the tribunal treats it as urgent [Article 249(8)].
Texts behind the row: Arms and military items for the armed forces, police and public authorities in Gibraltar
Transfers of items on the Common Military List and Category A, B and C firearms, "when destined for the armed forces, the police, or the public authorities of the United Kingdom in Gibraltar", are subject to "rules of Spanish law on export controls of defence and dual-use material"; "The Kingdom of Spain shall impose an authorisation requirement on the transfers of these items" [Article 261(1)]. Spain's competent authority "may refuse to grant a transfer authorisation and may annul, suspend, modify or revoke" one it has granted, in accordance with Regulations (EU) No 258/2012 and (EU) 2025/41 [Article 263(3)]. Except for goods transferred for commercial purposes and sanitary and phytosanitary goods, items that arrive on State aircraft, State vessels or in State consignments and are destined exclusively for the official use of the UK's Ministry of Defence or visiting third-country forces are "regulated exclusively by the special procedure" of Article 264, with a list and a certificate given to Spain's Liaison Officer before the transfer [Article 264(1)–(2)].
Texts behind the row: Airport joint venture company
A joint venture company "shall be constituted under the shared responsibility of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, and the Kingdom of Spain"; it "shall not be constituted in either State sharing responsibility ... and shall be constituted in a Member State" [Article 274(1)]. It selects, "through regular public tender", and supervises the commercial company managing the airport day to day [Article 274(1)].
Texts behind the row: Cruise ships and the port
The UK, for Gibraltar, "will ensure that no cruise liners call into Gibraltar directly from third countries other than from the United Kingdom" [Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.1]. That sentence is in a paragraph that opens "Where the conditions in Article 29(3) of the Agreement are met"; the text does not say whether the sentence applies only while those conditions are met. The conditions of Article 29(3) are "considered to have been met" for cruise ships where "no cruise ships start or end their itineraries at Gibraltar" [Arrangement , paragraph 2.2.2]. Where the Article 29(3) conditions are not met, paragraph 2.2.3 applies.
Texts behind the row: 2020 framework compared with the signed text on termination
The 2020 text says the treaty "may establish a reasonable implementation period", and then: "In the event that, after consultations on the results of the arrangements of the implementation period, either of the parts ... are not satisfied with the results at the end of the implementation period, the agreement will be terminated at the end of that period" [framework, paragraph 10]. The treaty provides for an evaluation by the EU-UK treaty committee at the latest four years after Part Two comes into force [Article 65] and for optional termination by the EU, "including at the request of the Kingdom of Spain", or by the UK [Article 66]. The 2020 text refers to Spanish officers in the port and airport, and says that during the implementation period Spain, in agreement with the Gibraltar authorities, "shall request operational assistance from the European Border and Coast Guard Agency" [framework, paragraph 10]; the words "Frontex" and "European Border and Coast Guard" do not appear in the treaty or in the seven arrangements.
Movement. Under the treaty, the UK, for Gibraltar, must regularly review the risks arising from residents travelling to the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full. It must also give Spain a risk assessment at least every three months. What follows Spain's decision to prohibit a resident from leaving Gibraltar is set out in the table. The authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, and of Spain each follow up the alerts in their own databases and information systems. The authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, have no access to information systems and databases set up on the basis of EU law. The table also notes the access to the EU transit system through Spain's IT system that the treaty gives them for the purposes it lists.
Movement. Under Article 46, the UK, for Gibraltar, must regularly review the risks arising from residents travelling to the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full and "at a minimum, every three months" give Spain a risk assessment [Article 46(1)]. What follows Spain's decision to prohibit a resident from leaving Gibraltar is set out in the table [Article 46(2)–(3)]. Under Article 34(1), the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, and of Spain each follow up the alerts in their own databases and information systems. The authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall have no access" to information systems and databases established on the basis of EU law [Article 31]. The table also notes the access to the EU transit system through Spain's IT system that Article 251(1) gives them for the purposes of Articles 242, 245, 247 and 248.
Residence. The rules on notification, objection and withdrawal for residence permits, and the exceptions to them, are set out in the table. Identity cards and residence permits may be issued only to people who meet the conditions in the legislation in force when the treaty entered into force. Proposed changes are notified to the Cooperation Council for an opinion, within the limits set out in the table. The 2019 tax agreement covers Spanish nationals who move their residency to Gibraltar after the date on which the tax agreement was signed. In all cases, they are to be considered tax residents of Spain only. This comes under the tax agreement's special rules for deciding residency. Those rules apply without affecting the criteria set out earlier in the tax agreement. The 2019 tax agreement also provides that the Gibraltarian tax authorities give the Spanish tax authorities direct and free access to the records of the Registrar of Companies in Gibraltar, as well as to the Gibraltar Land Registry.
Residence. The rules on notification, objection and withdrawal for residence permits, and the exceptions to them, are set out in the table [Articles 50–52]. Identity cards and residence permits may be issued only to people who meet the conditions in the legislation in force when the treaty entered into force; proposed changes are notified to the Cooperation Council for an opinion, within the limits set out in the table [Article 45(2), (4)]. The 2019 tax agreement provides that "Spanish nationals who move their residency to Gibraltar after the date on which this Agreement is signed shall in all cases only be considered tax residents of Spain", under the special rules for determining residency that apply "without prejudice to the criteria set forth in the preceding paragraphs" [Tax Agreement, Article 2(1)(c)(i)]. It also provides that the Gibraltarian tax authorities give the Spanish tax authorities "the direct and free access to the records of the Registrar of Companies in Gibraltar ... as well as to the Gibraltar Land Registry" [Tax Agreement, Article 3(5)(c)].
Goods and tax. The customs union is set out above. Until the Cooperation Council adopts its decision that sets the start date and declares that the border posts and customs offices at the port and airport are set up, working and controlled, and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar is treated as a third territory under EU customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law. Until then, goods other than those carried by travellers in personal luggage must be brought into Gibraltar and exported from Gibraltar only by land. There is an exception: EU goods may also be brought in by sea, and goods may also be moved by sea from Gibraltar to third countries. This document did not check whether that decision has been adopted. The tax rates and the safeguard procedure are set out in the table. Under the treaty, the EU countries credit the duty entitlements to the European Commission's account. The EU countries keep a percentage of the import duties they collect on behalf of the UK, for Gibraltar. They keep it as collection costs. The percentage is the retention rate that applies in the EU. Under an administrative arrangement on customs between the UK, for Gibraltar, and Spain, the customs and excise authorities of Spain have continuous real-time online access to information the treaty lists. This is for the actions and measures the treaty lists. In a joint visit, Spain's authorities ask the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, to carry out the relevant actions and measures under the treaty and the arrangement. Those authorities will do as asked. Joint visits begin with a notice from Spain's authorities where a risk to the EU internal market for goods has been identified.
Goods and tax. The customs union is set out above. Until the Cooperation Council adopts the decision in Article 247(1) and that decision enters into force, Gibraltar "shall be regarded as a third territory under Union customs, indirect taxation and trade-related law"; goods other than those carried by travellers in personal luggage "shall be brought into Gibraltar and be exported from Gibraltar only by land", and by derogation EU goods may also be brought in by sea and goods may also be moved by sea from Gibraltar to third countries [Article 247(3)–(5)]. This document did not check whether that decision has been adopted. The tax rates and the safeguard procedure are set out in the table [Annex 24; Articles 248–249]. Under Annex 21, Article 3(7), the EU countries credit the duty entitlements to the European Commission's account, and "shall retain, by way of collection costs, a percentage of the import duties collected" on behalf of the UK, for Gibraltar, at the retention rate that applies in the EU. Under Arrangement the customs and exciseExciseDuty on tobacco, alcohol and fuel, now tied to European Union (EU) minimums and, over time, to Spain’s rates. authorities of Spain have "continuous real-time online access" to the information in Article 2(2) of Annex 22 for the purposes of the actions and measuresMeasureThe treaty’s word for anything a government does that has legal effect: a law, a regulation, a decision, an administrative practice. listed in Article 2(1) of Annex 22 [paragraph 4.1], and in a joint visit Spain's authorities request the competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "to carry out the relevant actions and measures pursuant to the Agreement and Paragraph 2.2 of this Arrangement"; the latter "will proceed as requested" [paragraph 6.2.1]. Joint visits begin with a notification from Spain's authorities, "where a risk to the Union internal market for goods has been identified" [paragraph 6.1].
Security and infrastructure. The rules on arms and military items and on the airport joint venture company are set out in the table. Under the surveillance and pursuit arrangement, officers of either side may continue a pursuit in the other's territory where they pursue one of these persons: an individual caught in the act of committing, or taking part in, one of the offences listed in a treaty annex; or a person who has escaped from provisional custody or while serving a sentence. They may do so in line with the treaty's rule on pursuit and the arrangement's own rules on how a pursuit is carried out. They may also carry service weapons under the condition set out above. Whether pursuing officers may detain the person is set by a declaration that each side makes through the Working Group. Either the pursuing officers will not have the right to apprehend the pursued person, or, if no request to stop the pursuit is made and the local authorities cannot step in quickly enough, they may detain the person pursued until the local authorities can establish identity or arrest. This document did not find the text of either declaration. The cruise ship provision is in the table.
Security and infrastructure. The rules on arms and military items and on the airport joint venture company are set out in the table. Under Arrangement , officers of either Participant who pursue an individual caught in the act of committing, or taking part in, one of the offences listed in Annex 8 of the treaty, or who pursue a person who has escaped from provisional custody or while serving a sentence, may continue the pursuit in the other's territory, in accordance with Article 56 of the treaty and paragraphs 5.1 to 6.4 of the Arrangement [paragraph 4.1], and may carry service weapons under the condition quoted above [paragraph 6.4(d)]. Whether pursuing officers may detain the person is set by a declaration that each Participant makes through the Working Group [paragraph 6.2]: either the pursuing officers "will not have the right to apprehend the pursued person", or, if no request to cease the pursuit is made and the local authorities cannot intervene quickly enough, they "may detain the person pursued" until the local authorities can establish identity or arrest [paragraph 6.1]. This document did not find the text of either declaration. The cruise ship provision is in the table.
Environment, state aid and dispute settlement. The EU must not weaken or reduce its environmental and climate levels of protection below the levels in place on 31 December 2020. The UK, for Gibraltar, must uphold environmental and climate levels of protection that are equivalent to the levels in place in the EU. It must also make sure that its carbon pricing or equivalent measures have a scope and effectiveness equivalent to those in place in the EU at the time the treaty enters into force. Where a Party considers that the other Party's state aid causes, or seriously risks causing, a significant negative effect on trade in goods or investment, it may send a written request for information and consultations. No earlier than 60 days after the request, and after giving notice of the measures it intends to take, it may take appropriate remedial measures on its own if there is evidence of that effect. The measures must be limited to what is strictly necessary and proportionate. The other Party may ask for arbitration within five days. That request does not suspend the measures. The treaty's taxation chapter is not subject to the treaty's dispute settlement. The treaty also takes out of the provisions covered by its dispute settlement rules its chapters on taxation, labour and social standards, environment and climate, and other instruments for trade and sustainable development, together with some further treaty provisions listed in the texts.
Environment, state aid and dispute settlement. The EU "shall not weaken or reduce its environmental and climate levels of protection below the levels in place as at 31 December 2020" [Article 219(3)]. The UK, for Gibraltar, "shall uphold environmental and climate levels of protection that are equivalent to the levels in place in the Union" [Article 219(4)], and must ensure that its carbon pricing or equivalent measures have "an equivalent scope and effectiveness as the one in place in the Union at the time of the entry into force of this Agreement" [Article 220(2)]. Where a Party considers that the other Party's state aid causes, or seriously risks causing, "a significant negative effect on trade in goods or investment", it may deliver a written request for information and consultations; no earlier than 60 days from the request, and after notifying the measures it intends to take, it "may unilaterally take appropriate remedial measures" if there is evidence of that effect; the measures must be "restricted to what is strictly necessary and proportionate"; the other Party may ask for arbitration within five days, and that request does not suspend the measures [Article 209(1)–(4), (8)–(9)]. The taxation chapter "shall not be subject to dispute settlement under Part Six" [Article 213]; Article 301(2)(d) takes Chapters 3, 4, 5 and 6 of Title I of Part Three (taxation, labour and social standards, environment and climate, and other instruments for trade and sustainable development) out of the covered provisions, with Articles 199(1), (2) and (4), 207 and 208.
Governance. The table sets out two further treaty provisions. It also sets out the Declaration and the treaty rule on suspending obligations for a time. It also sets out how ending the administrative arrangements works together with the treaty rule on what then stops applying. The Concordat's commitment on termination is in the table of the case for. The EU and Spain are not parties to the Concordat, which is between the Government of the UK and the Government of Gibraltar.
Governance. The table sets out Article 19(5) and Article 66. It also sets out the Declaration and Article 67. It also sets out the termination of arrangements with Article 336(5). The Concordat's commitment on termination is in the table of the case for. The EU and Spain are not parties to the Concordat, which is between the Government of the UK and the Government of Gibraltar.
Articles 46 and 50–52 are written as obligations on the UK, for Gibraltar ("shall not issue", "shall withdraw ... without delay") [Articles 50(3), 50(5), 46(3), 52(3)]. On appeals: Article 46(2) names an appeal "before a national court of the Kingdom of Spain"; Article 50(3) says Spain's authorities, on the applicant's request, inform the applicant of "the appropriate remedies in accordance with national and Union law"; Article 52(3) refers to "a right of appeal in a national court" without saying which. The exceptions in Articles 46(4), 50(12), 51(11) and 52(4) are stated in the table.
Under Article 19(5), a notification of non-acceptance, a missed 30-day notification or a missed six-week implementation notice leads to the treaty being "considered terminated" unless the Cooperation Council, which decides by mutual consent, decides otherwise within 90 days.
Annex 24 sets the corridors for transaction taxTransaction taxThe tax that replaced import duty on 15 July 2026: charged when goods arrive, on goods only, never on services. and excise rates by reference to EU and Spanish rates, as set out in the table.
Transfers of the listed arms and military items for the armed forces, the police or the public authorities of the UK in Gibraltar need an authorisation from Spain's competent authority, except under the special procedure of Article 264 set out in the table (Articles 261–264). The airport joint venture company must be set up in an EU country, and not in either state sharing responsibility for it (Article 274(1)).
Three legal opinions were laid before the Gibraltar Parliament on 4 March 2026, the day after its motion of 3 March 2026 calling on the UK to sign and ratify the treaty (the motion is recorded in the Concordat): Lord Pannick KC (26 February), Sir Peter Caruana KCMG KC (2 March) and Jamie Trinidad KC (undated; on the draft published on 26 February). Pannick's opinion is addressed to the Attorney General for Gibraltar. Caruana's says the Attorney General asked him on behalf of His Majesty's Government of Gibraltar. Trinidad's says His Majesty's Government of Gibraltar asked him. Each was written on a draft of the treaty, not on the signed text of 14 July 2026. Caruana's opinion was also based on drafts of two administrative arrangements, those on border checks and on continued surveillance and uninterrupted pursuit.
The question put. Lord Pannick KC was asked whether anything in the treaty between the EU and the UK, setting out Gibraltar's future relationship with the EU, undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Jamie Trinidad KC was asked to advise whether any provisions of the draft treaty undermine the UK's sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Sir Peter Caruana KCMG KC was asked whether the treaty documents contain any legal concessions on sovereignty of Gibraltar. Lord Pannick and Jamie Trinidad conclude that nothing in the treaty undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Sir Peter Caruana concludes that it makes no concession on sovereignty, subject to what he says in his opinion about the airport. The questions were about legal sovereignty and jurisdiction. Sir Peter Caruana writes that his opinion is limited to sovereignty in its legal sense, and that he expresses no view whatsoever on the treaty from the perspective of political opinion. Lord Pannick writes that the treaty's practical measures certainly confer powers on the EU and, in some respects, on Spain as the relevant EU country, and involve the application of EU law, to be applied by the Court of Justice in the event of a dispute. Lord Pannick relies on the treaty's sovereignty clause and, as a further point, on the power to end the treaty by written notice. Jamie Trinidad writes that the architecture of the treaty is less constitutionally intrusive than EU membership. He writes that some of its obligations are qualitatively similar to those of membership. He also writes that some aspects can be considered more operationally intrusive than anything Gibraltar had to accept by virtue of its participation in the EU. He writes that Spanish coercive action at the border is best characterised as treaty-based, limited functional delegations. He compares it with juxtaposed controls under the Channel Tunnel arrangements.
The question put. Lord Pannick KC was asked whether anything in the treaty between the EU and the UK, setting out Gibraltar's future relationship with the EU, undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Jamie Trinidad KC was asked to advise whether any provisions of the draft Agreement undermine the UK's sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Sir Peter Caruana KCMG KC was asked whether the treaty documents contain any legal concessions on sovereignty of Gibraltar. Lord Pannick and Jamie Trinidad conclude that nothing in the treaty undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Sir Peter Caruana concludes that it makes no concession on sovereignty, subject to what he says in paragraph 8 (the airport). The questions were about legal sovereignty and jurisdiction. Sir Peter Caruana writes that his opinion is limited to sovereignty in its legal sense, and that he expresses no view whatsoever on the treaty from the perspective of political opinion (paragraph 6). Lord Pannick writes that the treaty's practical measures certainly confer powers on the EU and, in some respects, on Spain as the relevant EU country, and involve the application of EU law, to be applied by the Court of Justice in the event of a dispute (paragraph 60). Lord Pannick relies on Article 2 and, as a further point, on the power to terminate under Article 334 (paragraph 63). Jamie Trinidad writes that the architecture of the treaty is less constitutionally intrusive than EU membership. He writes that some of its obligations are qualitatively similar to those of membership. He also writes that some aspects can be considered more operationally intrusive than anything Gibraltar had to accept by virtue of its participation in the EU. He writes that Spanish coercive action at the border is best characterised as treaty-based, limited functional delegations. He compares it with juxtaposed controls under the Channel Tunnel arrangements.
The question put. Pannick was asked: "Does anything in the treaty between the EU and the UK setting out Gibraltar's future relationship with the EU undermine UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar?" Trinidad was asked to advise whether any provisions of the draft Agreement "undermine the UK's sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar". Caruana was asked whether the treaty documents contain "any legal concessions on sovereignty of Gibraltar". Pannick and Trinidad conclude that nothing in the treaty undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar. Caruana concludes that it makes no concession on sovereignty "subject to what I say in para 8" (the airport). The questions were about legal sovereignty and jurisdiction; Caruana writes that his opinion is limited to sovereignty in its legal sense and that he expresses "no view whatsoever" on the treaty from the perspective of political opinion (paragraph 6). Pannick writes that the treaty's practical measures "certainly confer powers on the EU, and in some respects Spain as the relevant Member States, and involve the application of EU law to be applied (in the event of a dispute) by the Court of Justice" (paragraph 60); he relies on Article 2 and, as a further point, on the power to terminate under Article 334 (paragraph 63). Trinidad writes that the architecture of the treaty is "less constitutionally intrusive than EU membership" and that some of its obligations are "qualitatively similar" to those of membership; he also writes that some aspects "can be considered more 'operationally' intrusive than anything Gibraltar had to accept by virtue of its participation in the EU" and that Spanish coercive action at the border is best characterised as "treaty-based, limited functional delegations", comparing it with juxtaposed controls under the Channel Tunnel arrangements.
Where Sir Peter Caruana's opinion rests on instructions. Sir Peter Caruana says that the meaning and reach of the treaty's airport provisions are not clear. He records that the Attorney General has informed and instructed him that the role of the joint venture company is limited to making sure that the tender process follows EU law and that the commercial company appointed complies with the relevant and specified requirements of the treaty. His conclusion that the airport provisions do not surrender sovereignty or jurisdiction over the airport holds so long as the company's role does not go beyond that role. He gives as examples the company being the contracting employer of the commercial company, or the commercial company's contract or employees being under the laws or courts of a place other than Gibraltar. He also writes that he is instructed that Gibraltar's obligations under the treaty will be administered by Gibraltar's own competent constitutional authorities and enforced by its own authorities. Question 22 of the question register asks about the airport joint venture company.
Where Caruana's opinion rests on instructions. Caruana calls the "purport and extent" of the Article 274 provisions "not clear". He records that the Attorney General "has informed and instructed" him that the role of the joint venture company is "limited to ensuring that the tender process is conducted in accordance with EU law and that the appointed commercial company complies with the relevant and specified Treaty requirements". His conclusion that Article 274 does not surrender sovereignty or jurisdiction over the airport holds "so long as" the company's role does not go beyond that role, giving as examples the company being the contracting employer of the commercial company, or the commercial company's contract or employees being under the laws or courts of a place other than Gibraltar. He also writes: "I am instructed that Gibraltar's obligations under the Treaty will be administered by Gibraltar's own competent constitutional authorities and enforced by its own authorities." Question 22 of the question register asks about the Article 274 joint venture company.
Sir Peter Caruana, on alerts held only in Gibraltar's databases. Sir Peter Caruana writes that under a group of the treaty's rules on alerts (and the proposed arrangements on Schengen), a person for whom there is an alert only in the Gibraltar databases and information systems cannot be detained by Gibraltar without their consent. If they do not consent, they must be allowed to exit Gibraltar. One of those rules covers alerts that exist only in one side's databases, where coercive action is required to arrest or detain the person. In that case, the person is not to object to the arrest or detention. Alternatively, the person is to be given a choice. On entry checks, the choice is to be refused entry. On exit checks, the choice is to be required to exit. He writes that these provisions do not constitute concessions of sovereignty to Spain or anyone else. But he writes that they curtail the legal effect and enforceability of Gibraltar's laws by its law enforcement agencies, and of arrest warrants issued by Gibraltar's courts. He writes that they do so in a way that would not appear to be required by the demands of the common, collective control of entry to and exit from the Schengen (plus Gibraltar) common space. A 2026 regulation on border checks and alerts, made by the Government of Gibraltar, provides for the procedure under that rule on alerts held by one side only in the course of border entry checks.
Caruana, paragraph 9. Caruana writes that under Articles 34(3) to 34(5) (and the proposed arrangements on Schengen), a person for whom there is an alert only in the Gibraltar databases and information systems "cannot be detained by Gibraltar without their consent and, if they do not, must be allowed to exit Gibraltar". The text of Article 34(5) is: where coercive action for arrest or detention is required on alerts that exist only in one side's databases, "the person shall not object to the arrest or detention; or alternatively the person shall be given the choice to be refused entry" (entry checks) or "to be required to exit" (exit checks). He writes that these provisions, "while not constituting concessions of Sovereignty to Spain or anyone else, curtail the legal effect and enforceability of Gibraltar's laws by its law enforcement agencies and of arrest warrants issued by Gibraltar's courts", in a way that "would not appear to be required by the exigencies of the common, collective control of access to and egress from the Schengen (plus Gibraltar) common space". Regulation 10 of the TGEU Implementation (Border Checks and Alerts) Regulations 2026 (LN 165/2026), made by the Government of Gibraltar, provides for the procedure under Article 34(5) in the course of border entry checks.
What each opinion covers. On the questions put to them (whether the treaty undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar, or contains legal concessions on sovereignty), all three conclude that it does not, Sir Peter Caruana subject to the first of two passages in a row of his opinion that deal with two specific provisions, on the airport and on arrest on alerts. This document has not set out everything else each opinion says; the opinions are in the sources list. Jamie Trinidad's opinion is marked privileged and confidential, and was laid before Parliament.
What each opinion covers. On the questions put to them (whether the treaty undermines UK sovereignty or jurisdiction over Gibraltar, or contains legal concessions on sovereignty), all three conclude that it does not (Caruana subject to his paragraph 8). Caruana's paragraphs 8 and 9 deal with two specific provisions, Article 274 (the airport) and Article 34 (arrest on alerts). This document has not set out everything else each opinion says; the opinions are in the sources list. Trinidad's opinion is marked "privileged and confidential" and was laid before Parliament.
Three provisions in the case against were checked against the text on 15 September 2026, and the other documents in this set carry them in the same words:
Article 66(2) — Spain's request and the EU's steps. The Declaration states that any EU measure, including termination, "will require a prior agreement of the Kingdom of Spain". Article 66(2) provides: "Where the Kingdom of Spain has requested the Union to terminate this Agreement… the Union shall take the necessary steps in accordance with its internal procedures, with a view to terminating this Agreement." These are two different provisions, one in a declaration and one in the treaty.
Articles 261 to 264 — arms and military items for the police, armed forces and public authorities in Gibraltar. Military-list items and Category A, B and C firearms "destined for the armed forces, the police, or the public authorities of the United Kingdom in Gibraltar" are subject to "rules of Spanish law on export controls", and "the Kingdom of Spain shall impose an authorisation requirement" on their transfer, granted by Spain's competent authority. Except for goods transferred for commercial purposes and sanitary and phytosanitary goods, items on State aircraft, vessels or consignments "destined in Gibraltar exclusively for the official use of the Ministry of Defence" or visiting third-country forces are regulated exclusively by the special procedure in Article 264.
Article 31 — EU databases. The competent authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, "shall have no access to information systems and databases established on the basis of Union law". Article 251(2) gives the competent authorities within the EU real time and continuous access to relevant IT systems used by the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, for the application of that Title.
Provisions in the case for were checked in the same way and are stated in the other documents in this set in the same words. Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals does not extend to people resident in Gibraltar. Residents who do not meet the other entry conditions must in any event not be prevented from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar. Where Spain's authorities require arrest or detention of a resident, the action may be carried out only by the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar. Residents are exempt from the Entry/Exit System and ETIAS, and no stamps are affixed. Obligations under the treaty's social security protocol may not be suspended under the treaty's rule on temporary measures after an arbitration ruling.
Provisions in the case for were checked in the same way and are stated in the other documents in this set in the same words: Spain's right to refuse entry to third-country nationals does not extend to persons resident in Gibraltar, and Article 43(2) says residents who do not meet the other entry conditions "shall in any event not be prevented" from crossing the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar [Articles 33(4)(a)(ii), 43(2)]; where Spain's authorities require arrest or detention of a resident, the action "may only be carried out" by the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar [Article 34(9)]; residents are exempt from the Entry/Exit System and ETIAS and no stamps are affixed [Article 42]; and obligations under the Social Security Protocol may not be suspended under Article 316 [Article 316(3)].
Read in full for both cases: the Concordat, the Council and Commission Declaration, the 2019 UK–Spain tax agreement, and the first five of the seven administrative arrangements. The sixth and seventh arrangements were read in part (definitions, IT access, joint visits, travellers, tobacco, final provisions). The two volumes of text (about 1.4 MB of extracted text) were searched by article heading and keyword. A list of treaty articles, passages of some of the annexes and some further numbered provisions were read word for word. The following were not checked from the texts. Whether provisional application has begun. The dates of any Gibraltar Legal Notices or of Gibraltar's 2026 Act that brings the treaty into Gibraltar law cited in the customs arrangement. Whether the Cooperation Council has adopted its decision that sets the date from which the EU customs and goods rules listed in the treaty apply in Gibraltar and declares that the border control posts and customs offices at the port and airport are set up, working and controlled as that decision sets out and that competent authorities within the EU have been named. The 24 June 2026 Terms of Reference for the consultative body provided for in the treaty. The treaty's annex of infrastructure rules. Any practice on the ground. The following were looked for in the texts and not found. First, any provision on whether Spanish border officers at the airport booths carry weapons (the border checks arrangement deals with uniform only; weapons are dealt with only in the surveillance and pursuit arrangement and the customs arrangement). Second, any text of the pursuit declarations under the surveillance and pursuit arrangement. Third, any figure for the treaty's financial mechanism. Fourth, any Gibraltar-side appeal route against a travel prohibition under the treaty. Fifth, any reference to Frontex or to the European Border and Coast Guard in the treaty or the seven arrangements. The extracted text has errors left by text recognition (signature marks, a duplicated article), which were disregarded. Provision numbers were taken from the headings as printed.
Read in full for both cases: the Concordat, the Council and Commission Declaration, the 2019 UK–Spain tax agreement, and Arrangements –5. Arrangements and were read in part (definitions, IT access, joint visits, travellers, tobacco, final provisions). Volumes I and II (about 1.4 MB of extracted text) were searched by article heading and keyword. The following were read verbatim: Articles 1–7, 16, 18–24, 25–38, 39–53, 55–57, 65–68, 122, 149–151, 199–201, 205, 209, 212–216, 219–220, 238–252, 258, 260–267, 271–276, 286, 291–293, 298–302, 312, 316, 319, 328–336; Annex 18 (introduction), Annex 21 Article 3, Annex 24 (Articles 1–10 and Appendix 2, paragraph 3), SSC.3, SSC.17, SSC.56, and PTOB.3–PTOB.5. The following were not checked from the texts. Whether provisional application has begun. The dates of any Gibraltar Legal Notices or of the Treaty on Gibraltar and the European Union Act 2026 cited in Arrangement 7. Whether the Article 247(1) Cooperation Council decision has been adopted. The 24 June 2026 Terms of Reference for the consultative body [Article 248(5)]. Annex 7 infrastructure rules. Any practice on the ground. The following were looked for in the texts and not found. First, any provision on whether Spanish border officers at the airport booths carry weapons (Arrangement addresses uniform only, paragraph 2.1.4; weapons are addressed only in Arrangements and ). Second, any text of the pursuit declarations under Arrangement , paragraph 6.2. Third, any figure for the Article 299 financial mechanism. Fourth, any Gibraltar-side appeal route against an Article 46(2) travel prohibition. Fifth, any reference to Frontex or to the European Border and Coast Guard in the treaty or the seven arrangements. The extracted text has OCR artefacts (signature marks, duplicated Article 37), which were disregarded. Article and paragraph numbers were taken from the headings as printed.
The full title of Gibraltar's 2026 Act that brings the treaty into Gibraltar law is the Treaty on Gibraltar and the European Union Act 2026.
Looked for in the texts and not found: any provision on whether Spanish border officers at the airport booths carry weapons (Arrangement addresses uniform only, paragraph 2.1.4; weapons are addressed only in Arrangements and ); any text of the pursuit declarations under Arrangement , paragraph 6.2; any figure for the Article 299 financial mechanism; any Gibraltar-side appeal route against an Article 46(2) travel prohibition; any reference to "Frontex" or the "European Border and Coast Guard" in the treaty or the seven arrangements.
Back to the top · Back to the front page
Texts of the Government of Gibraltar on this page (laws, legal notices, the Gazette, Hansard and press releases): © Crown copyright, Government of Gibraltar, reproduced under the Government's copyright notice with the source named and the copyright acknowledged; Hansard: © Gibraltar Parliament. Every one can be read free, in full, on this site (the texts: the Act and the Constitution; the law changes, with the Legal Notices; the statements, by sitting) or at the official source (Gibraltar Laws; Hansard on parliament.gi; press releases).
© 2026 Premier Global Market Solutions Limited. All rights reserved.