Five statements about the treaty on Gibraltar, each with the provision it rests on and a link to where the question is set out in full.
The English texts come from the official English versions published by the European Union (EU) on EUR-Lex, the United Kingdom (UK) on GOV.UK and UK Parliament, and Gibraltar (the Acts and legal notices that change Gibraltar's law for the treaty, from Gibraltar Laws and the Gibraltar Gazette, and Gibraltar Parliament records: Hansard, Bills and Command Papers), plus HM Government of Gibraltar and European Commission press releases where a statement is quoted. Where a text exists only in Spanish (BOE), we quote it in Spanish and say so, and any translation beside it is ours.
Officers and borders. People may cross between Gibraltar and the Schengen area without border checks (sea borders aside). Either side may bring checks back for a serious threat (last resort, six months at most). A side may also suspend some of its obligations under Article 67, after consultations, for serious non-respect of commitments or a serious and persistent security threat; checks then return from the eighth day after notice, or a later date it gives. Spanish officers at airport booths may, as a general rule, wear uniform. Spanish officers on surveillance or pursuit in Gibraltar may carry service weapons, unless the side asked (our reading: the side into whose territory the surveillance continues) decides otherwise on surveillance. Using them is banned except in legitimate self-defence. Spanish customs officers on joint visits or at the port wear civilian clothes, unarmed. Questions 1.1 to 1.3
The Parties must ensure that persons “may circulate between Gibraltar and the Member States applying the Schengen acquis in full without border checks being carried out, without prejudice to the provisions on sea borders in Annex VI of the Schengen Borders Code” (Article 30(1)). Where there is a serious threat to public policy, public health or internal security, the applying the in full or the , “may exceptionally reinstate border control” for up to 10 days, which may be prolonged by 20 days and then by periods of one month, up to six months in all; this may be done only as a last resort and not beyond what is strictly necessary (Article 30(2)). As a general rule, Spanish officers in the airport immigration booths may be in uniform (Arrangement , paragraph 2.1.4(a)). Spanish officers carrying out continued surveillance in Gibraltar under Article 55 may carry service weapons during the surveillance, “save where specifically otherwise decided by the requested Participant” (Arrangement , paragraph 3.4(c); the arrangement does not define that term). Spanish officers in a pursuit under Article 56 may carry service weapons (paragraph 6.4(d)). In both cases their use is prohibited “save in cases of legitimate self-defence”. Spanish customs officers on a joint visit (Arrangement , joint visits, paragraph 11.8) and at the port (Arrangement , travellers, paragraph 6.4) are in civilian clothes, suitably identified, and carry no service weapons; at the port, the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, escort them (travellers, paragraph 6.4).The UK, for GibraltarThe treaty's second side is the United Kingdom (UK) acting for Gibraltar. The treaty's own words are “the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar”.Schengen rulesThe common rules of the Schengen area on crossing borders and on police and visa cooperation, including the shared alert database. The treaty calls them the “Schengen acquis”.EU countriesThe countries that belong to the European Union (EU). The treaty calls each of them a “Member State”.
Our reading of “requested Participant”: the side into whose territory the surveillance continues.
Residents. Residents of Gibraltar must not be stopped from entering it, even if other entry conditions are not met. Spain may bar a resident from leaving for the Schengen area, but only if it considers the resident a sufficiently serious threat to public policy, internal security, public health or its international relations. If Spain makes that decision, it must notify the UK's authorities for Gibraltar, giving the reasons and an appeal route to a Spanish court. An appeal need not pause the decision. Spain may object to a residence permit within 28 days of notice, extendable by up to 14, where it considers the applicant a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of an EU country. That objection rule applies only until the Visa Information System starts operating (Article 50(10)); after that Article 51 applies. The bar and the objection leave out some people (Articles 46(4) and 50(12)). Questions 1.5, 1.6 and 1.9
A person resident in Gibraltar (Article 26(j)) who does not meet the other Schengen entry conditions “shall in any event not be prevented from crossing” the border crossing points to enter Gibraltar (Article 43(2)). If Spain considers that a resident “constitutes a sufficiently serious threat to public policy or internal security, public health or its international relations”, it may decide that the person is prohibited from leaving Gibraltar to travel into the EU countries that apply the Schengen rules in full. It notifies the authorities of the UK, for Gibraltar, giving the reasons and the means of appeal “before a national court of the Kingdom of Spain”; an appeal need not have suspensive effect (Article 46(2)). Article 46 does not apply to the persons listed in Article 46(4). Before the UK, for Gibraltar, issues or renews a residence permit, it notifies Spain. Within 28 days Spain may object, where the applicant is considered a threat to public policy, internal security, public health or the international relations of an EU country, and it may extend the 28 days by up to 14 days (Article 50(2) to (4)). These steps do not apply to the persons listed in Article 50(12), and Article 50 applies only until the Visa Information System starts operating (Article 50(10)), after which Article 51 applies.
Information about people and businesses in Gibraltar reaches Spain or the EU by separate routes, each under its own rule. Examples: notice of residence permits (Article 50(2)); a risk assessment on residents at least every three months (Article 46(1)); each year, tax information on people who work in Gibraltar and live in Spain within a radius of 80 km of Gibraltar (2019 tax agreement, Article 3(5)(a) and (15)(b)(i)); and access for the within the EU to “any relevant IT systems” that Gibraltar's competent authorities use for the application of the customs Title (Article 251(2)). Some information also comes back to Gibraltar (2019 tax agreement, Article 3(10)). Under Article 31, “Under this Agreement, the competent authorities of the United Kingdom, in respect of Gibraltar, shall have no access to information systems and databases established on the basis of Union law”; Article 251(1) gives them access to the EU's transit system through Spain's IT system, for the purposes of applying Articles 242, 245, 247 and 248.Competent authorityThe public body a country has put in charge of the matter. For Gibraltar, usually the Government department or regulator named in the Act. The treaty calls it the “competent authority”.
There are three ways.
Other breaches do not end the treaty by themselves. Most go through the steps for settling disputes. There is one exception. If one side considers that the other has seriously and substantially failed to meet an essential element of the treaty, it may end the treaty or any agreement added to it, or suspend all or part of either. Before that, it must ask the Cooperation Council to meet at once to look for a timely solution that both sides can agree to. It may act only if none is found within 30 days of the request. The failure's gravity and nature would have to be exceptional: it would have to threaten peace and security or have international repercussions. The treaty does not affect the legal positions of the UK and Spain on sovereignty and jurisdiction.
Articles 2, 16, 19, 24, 66 and 334 · Questions 1.37 to 1.40
For the EU acts that Article 19 covers, the treaty “shall be considered terminated” if the UK, for Gibraltar, notifies that it does not accept a subsequent EU act, does not notify within the 30 days of Article 19(3), or does not inform the EU within six weeks of the act's entry into force that it has implemented it, unless the Cooperation Council “decides otherwise within 90 days”; termination takes effect three months after the end of the 90 days (Article 19(5)). The Cooperation Council “shall adopt decisions and make recommendations by mutual consent” (Article 24(2)). Either Party may end the treaty by written notice, effective on the first day of the twelfth month after the notice (Article 334). After the evaluation referred to in Article 65, the EU, “including at the request of the Kingdom of Spain”, and the UK “may terminate this Agreement by written notification through diplomatic channels”, and the treaty ceases to be in force on the first day of the twelfth month following the date of notification (Article 66(1)). If one side considers that the other has seriously and substantially failed to meet the essential elements (Articles 8(1), 9(1) and 10(1)), it “may decide to terminate or suspend the operation of this Agreement or any supplementing agreement in whole or in part”; before doing so it “shall request that the Cooperation Council meet immediately with a view to seeking a timely and mutually agreeable solution”, and if none is found “within 30 days from the date of the request to the Cooperation Council” it “may take the measures” (Article 16(2) and (3)). The first sentence of Article 16(5) reads: “The Parties consider that, for a situation to constitute a serious and substantial failure to fulfil any of the obligations described as essential elements in paragraph 1, its gravity and nature would have to be of an exceptional sort that threatens peace and security or that has international repercussions.” The treaty does not prejudice the legal positions of the UK and Spain on sovereignty and jurisdiction (Article 2).
The UK, for Gibraltar, made no notification under Article 122(2) (, in operation from 23 July 2026: “makes no notification in relation to this provision”). Surrender on an arrest warrant may not be refused on the ground that the requested person is a national of the UK (Article 122(1)). A notification may next be made “during the three months prior to the fourth anniversary of the entry into force of this Agreement”, provided the conditions in Article 122(2) are met at that time (Article 149). Article 336(4) reads “entry into force” as the date from which the treaty is provisionally applied; that date is 15 July 2026 (European Commission press release IP/26/1609), so the window is the three months before 15 July 2030.
Front page: the documents, and the texts themselves. What's coming · Grants and support for businesses · Who funds this site · Support this site · Refunds and cancellation · Terms of use · Privacy notice · No advertising on these pages
Texts of the Government of Gibraltar on this page (laws, legal notices, the Gazette, Hansard and press releases): © Crown copyright, Government of Gibraltar, reproduced under the Government's copyright notice with the source named and the copyright acknowledged; Hansard: © Gibraltar Parliament. Every one can be read free, in full, on this site (the texts: the Act and the Constitution; the law changes, with the Legal Notices; the statements, by sitting) or at the official source (Gibraltar Laws; Hansard on parliament.gi; press releases).
© 2026 Premier Global Market Solutions Limited. All rights reserved.